NEW
#1

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
There were several changes made over the weekend. A couple were made in hopes of improving/stabilizing the page load performance of the site.
Rather than sometimes it loads lightning fast, but most times it takes several seconds ... the goal is to be more lightning fast than anything else. Personally, I like fast.
Since this past Monday, what has your experience been with the site in regards it how quickly it is loading for you?
This test shows that the site loads faster than 96% of the other sites tested. [ATTACH]259[/Attach]
Rather than sometimes it loads lightning fast, but most times it takes several seconds ... the goal is to be more lightning fast than anything else. Personally, I like fast.
Since this past Monday, what has your experience been with the site in regards it how quickly it is loading for you?
This test shows that the site loads faster than 96% of the other sites tested. [ATTACH]259[/Attach]
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#2

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
The lack of feedback, is that because the site is too slow to make a post? lol
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#3

play2win
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 29, 2012
Posts: 2,812

play2win
Senior Member
Joined:Mar 29, 2012
Posts:2,812
I noticed a change from this weekend. Much better. Yeah, even with edits, on a mobile device.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#4

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Posts: 20,215

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined:Aug 08, 2008
Posts:20,215
just saw this.
You have overloaded us with new posts and this one snuck by me.
It is lighting fast.
"This page was generated in 0.089 seconds."
edit
"This page was generated in 0.113 seconds."
"This page was generated in 0.053 seconds."
You have overloaded us with new posts and this one snuck by me.
It is lighting fast.
"This page was generated in 0.089 seconds."
edit
"This page was generated in 0.113 seconds."
"This page was generated in 0.053 seconds."
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#5

Rockmolder
Honored Member
Joined: Sep 14, 2008
Posts: 7,611

Rockmolder
Honored Member
Joined:Sep 14, 2008
Posts:7,611
I've never really had the feeling that it was slow, but it's blazing fast now.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#6

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
I am kind of particular about speed. I do not like having to wait more than ~1 second for a page to load. The software is very fast, but it's troubling to find a host and configuration that can keep up.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#7

nerdmann
Premier Member
Joined: Sep 15, 2008
Posts: 30,967

nerdmann
Premier Member
Joined:Sep 15, 2008
Posts:30,967
Looks great to me.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#8

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
nerdmann;241071Looks great to me.
Thanks, but what about how quick/slow the pages load?
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#9

PackerTraxx
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 13, 2008
Posts: 2,158

PackerTraxx
Senior Member
Joined:Aug 13, 2008
Posts:2,158
I didn't know why but now I do...it's much faster.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#10

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Posts: 20,215

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined:Aug 08, 2008
Posts:20,215
"This page was generated in 0.176 seconds."
I can not abide these slow load times.
[laughing]
I can not abide these slow load times.
[laughing]
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others