Green Bay Packers ( 3 - 2 )

• Total Offense = 5th
• Passing Offense =4th
• Rushing Offense =5th
  
• Total Defense = 16th
• Passing Defense =18th
• Rushing Defense =3rd
  
• Points For = 27.4 (5th)
• Points Against = 22.8 (17th)

Cleveland Browns ( 3 - 3 )

• Total Offense = 24th
• Passing Offense = 17th
• Rushing Offense =22nd
  
• Total Defense = 7th
• Passing Defense = 8th
• Rushing Defense =7th
  
• Points For =19.7 (24th)
• Points Against = 20.8 (11th)

Browns defense numbers look pretty good. I still say let the Packers TE Finley and Bostick work at WR some... especially since the main reason Bostick seems to not get on the field is because of his lack of blocking skills and WR don't need to be as good of blockers as TEs do.

Also something I think is note worthy.

3 of the 4 Browns CBs are listed under 5'10"
3 of the 4 Browns S are listed under 6'

Boykins 6' 2"
Nelson 6' 3"
Bostick 6' 3"
Finley 6' 5"

Might be able to throw some jump balls. Also just thought of this, I'm sure the Packers want to stick with their run game but those 4 spread out with Lacy back there would be interesting combo.

Or take one off and put Quarless in as a blocker.

Well if we make the Browns one dimensional this could be fun. We need to get pressure though.

At least we don't have to worry about Trent Richardson.

My only worry is covering TE Cameron over the middle, that guy can play football.

Jakest3r;259757My only worry is covering TE Cameron over the middle, that guy can play football.

I dont know much about the browns these days - used to be a easy win ...

I agree with beast - be interesting if we can use your TEs more as WRs ... why not.
Hope jones and #18 have a quick recovery.

Funny our D is only rated what #16; what I have seen this year is our D is the one saving our bacon in all these games (or attempting too) - Now not perfect; dont get me wrong (our corners and especially our safetys really need to watch some film) (I Still dont know why we got rid of woodson; at least he watched film and studied these QBs and maybe that would rub off on some of these younger guys).


... I digress ...

like to see bostick out there; he looked ' decent' in preaseason.

Dulak;259760I dont know much about the browns these days - used to be a easy win ...

I agree with beast - be interesting if we can use your TEs more as WRs ... why not.
Hope jones and #18 have a quick recovery.

Funny our D is only rated what #16; what I have seen this year is our D is the one saving our bacon in all these games (or attempting too) - Now not perfect; dont get me wrong (our corners and especially our safetys really need to watch some film) (I Still dont know why we got rid of woodson; at least he watched film and studied these QBs and maybe that would rub off on some of these younger guys).


... I digress ...

like to see bostick out there; he looked ' decent' in preaseason.

The D has held up.
Unlike the O, they are not stat whores.

Alot of the stats against the D came in garbage time.

Packers' injuries so bad, game-day roster may come up short. Crazy.

Yeah it has been a huge shock to the team. It is really going to be a team by committee for a while.

No Problem - an easy win at home. The Packers offense comes to life similar to the Redskins game, even against a better defense - Rodgers has some new toys to play with. The young LBs do the job.

Packers 45 Browns 17