Search for Sterling Sharpe ... the search returns results from 2 years ago.. however there are results that should be returned much more recent than that.

http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/t21521-2nd-Round--53rd-Overall--WR-Davante-Adams#post275807 [ATTACH]1441[/Attach]

This is a feature to get users to accuse the admin of deleting posts.
Thus far, SUCCESS!

I'll update the PP site and throw a fresh backup and see if this was fixed in one of the many releases since we've updated PH.
I thought it was, but we shall see! :)

I wouldn't make something up...that is not my character despite what you might think of it.
I couldn't believe I couldn't find one mention of Sterling Sharpe in the search function but I could of Davante Adams and both terms were within the same posts.
To me that seemed incredibly questionable.
I went back through page after page of my posts as there are less than 400 and I could only find the one related to his statement about Davante being better than Sharpe.


Did I think you did it, Zero?
No.
Did I think p2w had something to do with it?
Quite possibly.
I don't know who here has what powers.
I've seen him edit things in his posts before...I've done the same but not to cover my tracks so to speak.
I was put off by contention that he never said that.
He was very dogmatic which further heightened my suspicion the evidence had been done away with because why would you be so dogmatic if you knew the evidence was out there?
Simple logic directed me combined with my inability to find diddly when I searched on Sharpe or Sterling related to this that I couldn't logically conclude someone hadn't done something.

I apologize if you feel I cast aspersions on you.
Same for p2w...but my allegations were based off a sound premise not paranoia.

uffda udfa;277858I wouldn't make something up...that is not my character despite what you might think of it.
I couldn't believe I couldn't find one mention of Sterling Sharpe in the search function but I could of Davante Adams and both terms were within the same posts.
To me that seemed incredibly questionable.
I went back through page after page of my posts as there are less than 400 and I could only find the one related to his statement about Davante being better than Sharpe.


Did I think you did it, Zero?
No.
Did I think p2w had something to do with it?
Quite possibly.
I don't know who here has what powers.
I've seen him edit things in his posts before...I've done the same but not to cover my tracks so to speak.
I was put off by contention that he never said that.
He was very dogmatic which further heightened my suspicion the evidence had been done away with because why would you be so dogmatic if you knew the evidence was out there?
Simple logic directed me combined with my inability to find diddly when I searched on Sharpe or Sterling related to this that I couldn't logically conclude someone hadn't done something.

I apologize if you feel I cast aspersions on you.
Same for p2w...but my allegations were based off a sound premise not paranoia.

Most would probably classify as me as "different" when it comes to how 'I' admin the site.
Most of your Packers sites are driven by greed or financial gain of some kind. As you can see, there is no PLEASE DONATE or a plethora of ads slapping you in the face.
PH is about my passion for the Packers and my desire to give fans a place to discuss the team's affairs. And yes, critical as this is, it is also a place for me to experiment with my professional trade as a software programmer.


You can point the finger at the software rather than someone deleting their post as you surely are aware ... posts do not get deleted here with any ease whatsoever. ;-)


btw, I'm looking into fixing this BS search we have.

I would like to add to the OP...
I did find a mention of Sharpe 8 months ago...that was the most recent one I could find...I also experienced what you found and screenshotted.

This is a confirmed issue. I did a sql query and found posts well sooner than two years ago.

Full Text Search has been disabled. Searching works great now, with the exception a search takes between 60 - 120 seconds now.

Sweet. Good work.
Did you find why it occurred?
I'm curious why it produced results on certain terms and not on others?


No implication that it was intentional whatsoever...just curious.

uffda udfa;277891Sweet. Good work.
Did you find why it occurred?
I'm curious why it produced results on certain terms and not on others?


No implication that it was intentional whatsoever...just curious.

There is two search methods. I switched us over to a different one that appears to be working whereas the other failed.