The Ranks on the site are boring and honestly when they were thrown up, they were just to replace the existing generic ones. After about 8 years it's time to think of some new ranks and thresholds.


Share some ranking titles or schema's you would like to see.

Not to sound too sarcastic or anything but I do find it slightly hilarious you're complaining about forum ranks being boring when you have "Legend" as yours. [flapper] [boxing]

I dunno, what about a system of ranks after all time Packer greats? Start off with I dunno, Driver or Kramer and work your way up to the retired numbered guys like Hutson, Starr and Canadeo with guys like Nitschke, Sharpe and Coffman in the middle?

Mucky Tundra;299825Not to sound too sarcastic or anything but I do find it slightly hilarious you're complaining about forum ranks being boring when you have "Legend" as yours. [flapper] [boxing]

I dunno, what about a system of ranks after all time Packer greats? Start off with I dunno, Driver or Kramer and work your way up to the retired numbered guys like Hutson, Starr and Canadeo with guys like Nitschke, Sharpe and Coffman in the middle?

When that rank was set, it wasn't expected to be reached for a long time. What can i say, I post a lot lol
and i dont like the rank.

Zero2Cool;299826When that rank was set, it wasn't expected to be reached for a long time. What can i say, I post a lot lol
and i dont like the rank.

I thought that was just a custom rank you gave yourself as an admin perk lol. You must post a lot because not even some of the posters who have been here from the beginning have that rank.

Mucky Tundra;299828I thought that was just a custom rank you gave yourself as an admin perk lol. You must post a lot because not even some of the posters who have been here from the beginning have that rank.

Nope, no custom title ranks.

Mucky Tundra;299825Not to sound too sarcastic or anything but I do find it slightly hilarious you're complaining about forum ranks being boring when you have "Legend" as yours. [flapper] [boxing]

I dunno, what about a system of ranks after all time Packer greats? Start off with I dunno, Driver or Kramer and work your way up to the retired numbered guys like Hutson, Starr and Canadeo with guys like Nitschke, Sharpe and Coffman in the middle?

I like this idea so long as I don't end up being Anthony Dilweg or Terrell Buckley.

musccy;299830I like this idea so long as I don't end up being Anthony Dilweg or Terrell Buckley.

I thought at first of just using normal Packer players before getting to the greats and beginning with draft busts like Carroll and Mandarich

Mucky Tundra;299831I thought at first of just using normal Packer players before getting to the greats and beginning with draft busts like Carroll and Mandarich

The problem with that is that once a poster gets to the Gilbert Brown rank, he'll immediately stop posting. At least I would. [-(

Using Packer greats is a good idea.
Don't start with busts though.
The new people would get them and some will be offended.

A question to ask is how many do you want to use?
10-20-30?
The more you use the closer some ranks will need to be.
After all other than Zero what good would it be to have 10 ranks greater than 100,000 posts?

I prefer being the Sensai of the Dojo of Coolness.
All that other stuff is for you geeky little boys.