The grading matches up with what we see on Sunday. Packers Guards are playing well, but the rest of the offensive-line is failing to hold up even medicorcy.

Center
Corey Linsley

• Overall: 15th Pass Block: 12th
  Run Block: 18th

J.C. Tretter

• Overall: 73rd Pass Block: 20th
  Run Block: 15th

Guards
Josh Sitton

• Overall: 4th
  Pass Block: 1st
  
  Run Block: 24th

T.J. Lang

• Overall: 9th Pass
  Block: 3rd
  Run Block: 30th

Tackles
David Bakhtiari

• Overall: 26th
  Pass Block: 19th
  Run
  Block:
  90th

Bryan Bulaga

• Overall: 31stPass Block: 27th
  Run Block: 109th

Source: ProFootballFocus.com

Do they put up numbers as a unit?

Just trying to figure out how Bulaga is 109th in run blocking?

I'm guessing The Packers just don't run to the right that much and when they do hasn't been that effective?

Linsley's numbers would seem to be better than mediocre if these are overall numbers.

I'm guessing there are a minimum of 320 players being graded.

Does the full chart have the total number of players being graded?

Does that include guys like Josh Walker, who has played a minimum of plays?

Is the number of plays a players has participated being figured into the equation?

buckeyepackfan;336911Do they put up numbers as a unit?

I won't pay for the information anymore. When it was $20 a year, it was entertaining, but now they want $1,200 and that ain't gonna fly.

They put those ratings into that big bucks category and stuck us with 'grades' of 0-100. Kind of a joke to me.
What I liked about them was the transparency of where you could see a breakdown on how each player earned that rating.
A player could get a rating of -1.5 one game and then the next get +2.4 if they did really well. Something like that. You could then break down to see why. Maybe they went against J.J. Watt and he ate them for lunch?

Either way, the grades they have now are fractionally interesting at best and the breakdown stuff I mentioned is just too rich for my hobbyist blood.

Zero2Cool;336922I won't pay for the information anymore. When it was $20 a year, it was entertaining, but now they want $1,200 and that ain't gonna fly.

They put those ratings into that big bucks category and stuck us with 'grades' of 0-100. Kind of a joke to me.
What I liked about them was the transparency of where you could see a breakdown on how each player earned that rating.
A player could get a rating of -1.5 one game and then the next get +2.4 if they did really well. Something like that. You could then break down to see why. Maybe they went against J.J. Watt and he ate them for lunch?

Either way, the grades they have now are fractionally interesting at best and the breakdown stuff I mentioned is just too rich for my hobbyist blood.

Tight ass!
That's just a drop in the bucket for a guy like you isn't it?
[flapper]

Wow, Bulaga and Bahktiari graded out better than I expected.
What a studley offensive line!
And folks want to blame Aaron Rodgers and Eddie Lacy for not getting the job done.
To think the backups are even worse is maddening.
You're doing a helluva job Ted.