NEW
#1
NEW
#2
Awesome. Simply Awesome.
This game will probably be my second most replayed game after the 'Hawks vs. Packers playoff game last season.
I'll be honest, I never thought our current O-line starters, even on their best day, would be able to dominate like they did vs the Bears. Magnificent.
This game will probably be my second most replayed game after the 'Hawks vs. Packers playoff game last season.
I'll be honest, I never thought our current O-line starters, even on their best day, would be able to dominate like they did vs the Bears. Magnificent.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#3
It looked like we abandoned the ZBS scheme in this game. Our O-line was more physical than finesse and pushin the bears d-line back. If we do that more I think our running game will be better. This was one of the best games of the season, that and the Indy game.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#4
"JNelson87"It looked like we abandoned the ZBS scheme in this game. Our O-line was more physical than finesse and pushin the bears d-line back.
The tenants of ZBS don't necessarily involve cut blocking every time. The important principle is getting blocking in the second level, so the LBs and DB are covered. The ZBS thrives on having cutback lanes, not cut blocking per se.
Generally cut blocking is used to clear out a cut back lane, but those cut-back lanes can also be created in other ways. For example, LT pushes his man outside, LG pushes his man inside. You have a gap between the two, which the FB would go through and block / cut-block a player on the 2nd level. In such a scenario, the RB starts out right, but then can cutback to the left to go through the hole between the LT and LG, and technically has some of the 2nd level defenders blocked or down on the field via cut block, creating some space to do something.
The Packers put on a ZB clinic, a beat writer said it best when wondering if it was the Packers o-line or the Broncos o-line out there.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#5
NEW
#6
NEW
#7
Thanks for the video as usual. It actually has some of Rodgers' throws in slightly slower speed, which I've been trying to find. Thanks again.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#8
Hester bouncing off Cole was hillarious.
I really like this defense, I think Hawk fits very neatly as MLB, and Chillar is not bad at all. Our secondary might very well be one of the best in the league. If we make it, we could explode into the playoffs and go very far. I think this is a team that thrives on those big games, that's one important ingredient in a championship team, another is a high-scoring defense.
I really like this defense, I think Hawk fits very neatly as MLB, and Chillar is not bad at all. Our secondary might very well be one of the best in the league. If we make it, we could explode into the playoffs and go very far. I think this is a team that thrives on those big games, that's one important ingredient in a championship team, another is a high-scoring defense.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#9
Thus far this is one of the better games.A-rod ,Grant coming into play showed why they can be,a very good team,I know the bears can't wait for that game.At home think it will be a little different but the out come will be the pack.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others