Enter the GameDay Chat
to discuss the game via the instant chat feature.

Click HERE to watch the game!



Green Bay Packers ( 1 - 1 )

Total Offense = 11th
Passing Offense = 20th
Rushing Offense = 6th

Total Defense = 10th
Passing Defense = 4th
Rushing Defense = 27th

Points For =
17.0 (23rd)
Points Against = 16.5 (7th)

Tampa Bay Buccaneers ( 2 - 0 )

Total Offense = 24th
Passing Offense =
23rd
Rushing Offense = 13th

Total Defense = 5th
Passing Defense = 8th
Rushing Defense = 9th

Points For =
19.5 (18th)
Points Against = 6.5 (1st)

[attach]3792[/attach]

Buccaneers are -2.5 favorites and the over/under is at 41. So, bettors got this one something like Buccaneers 21, Packers 19.

Buccaneers defense doesn't look at stout vs the run as they were last year and year before. I saw some big lanes opened up. Can Packers OL create those lanes?

GB 23
TB 21

GB 27
TAMPAX 17

Something that's been on my mind is if Mike Evans suspension is held up, this will be something Tom Brady will use to rally the troops. The officials are out to get us!!! I mean, dude can't go shove someone like that, but athletes find anyway to be the underdog. Add to it that Rodgers doesn't seem to perform well in Florida and 😬

Zero2Cool;453395Something that's been on my mind is if Mike Evans suspension is held up, this will be something Tom Brady will use to rally the troops. The officials are out to get us!!! I mean, dude can't go shove someone like that, but athletes find anyway to be the underdog. Add to it that Rodgers doesn't seem to perform well in Florida and 😬

The officials being against Brady? 🤣

Not sure the guys would buy that.

nerdmann;453403The officials being against Brady? 🤣

Not sure the guys would buy that.

I said to get "us" as in the team, not one person. Follow along. 😁

The biggest complaint I have seen has to do with the fact that Jon Runyan Sr. Is the (original vs. appeal?) decision maker regarding the suspension. With his son on our team, it might have been better had he recused himself. Hopefully he has no role in the appeal, but I simply do not know that process. If anyone deserves a one game suspension, Mike Evans does, but that's my admittedly biased opinion.

dfosterf;453406The biggest complaint I have seen has to do with the fact that Jon Runyan Sr. Is the (original vs. appeal?) decision maker regarding the suspension. With his son on our team, it might have been better had he recused himself. Hopefully he has no role in the appeal, but I simply do not know that process. If anyone deserves a one game suspension, Mike Evans does, but that's my admittedly biased opinion.

Requesting an appeal has often been used in this manner, to avoid being suspended until your team faces a lesser opponent. It's part of the system like that.

I say, let's beat them soundly, no matter who they got on the field.

From PFT:

"Former NFL wide receiver James Thrash heard the appeal Tuesday."

The decision is expected to be announced tomorrow, so if the plan was to drag this out to avoid being suspended Sunday by appeal machinations... that doesn't seem to be working so good. The best part is that it wasn't Jon Runyan Sr. also hearing the appeal, as evidenced by the mouth breathers on PFT bitching about precisely what I referenced, at least some of them.