https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/multiple-sideline-reporters-react-to-charissa-thompsons-admission-of-faked-sideline-reports

Multiple sideline reporters react to Charissa Thompson’s admission of faked sideline reports


Multiple sideline reporters have reacted to the admission from former sideline reporter, and current Fox Sports and Amazon Prime host, Charissa Thompson that she would, at times, make up content for her in-game reports.

Said Thompson on the Pardon My Take podcast, via Brandon Contes of AwfulAnnouncing.com: “I’ve said this before. I haven’t been fired [for] saying it, but I’ll say it again. I would make up the report sometimes, because A, the coach wouldn’t come out at halftime, or it was too late and I didn’t want to screw up the report. So I was like, ‘I’m just gonna make this up.’ . . . Because first of all, no coach is gonna get mad if I say, ‘Hey, we need to stop hurting ourselves, we need to be better on third down, we need to stop turning the ball over and do a better job of getting off the field.’ They’re not gonna correct me on that. So I’m like, it’s fine, I’ll just make up the report.”

Others who currently do the job think it is not fine. As of this posting, at least four prominent sideline reporters have weighed in on Twitter/X.

Said ESPN’s Molly McGrath: “This is not normal or ethical. Coaches and players trust us with sensitive information, and if they know that you’re dishonest and don’t take your role seriously, you’ve lost all trust and credibility.”

Added Tracy Wolfson of CBS: “This is absolutely not ok, not the norm and upsetting on so many levels. I take my job very seriously, I hold myself accountable for all I say, I build trust with coaches and never make something up. I know my fellow reporters do the same.”

NBC’s Kathryn Tappen called it “deplorable.”

“I hold myself to the highest standard in everything I do,” Tappen said on Twitter/X. “I KNOW my hard working colleagues do the same. We earn respect the hard way. To those commenting on the irrelevant role of sideline reporters — beat it! WE ARE JOURNALISTS. THESE actions are not normal.”

Finally, and perhaps most significantly, Thompson’s colleague at Fox Sports, Laura Okmin, spoke out against the admission.

“THE privilege of a sideline role is being the 1 person in the entire world who has the opportunity to ask coaches what’s happening in that moment,” Okmin posted. “I can’t express the amount of time it takes to build that trust. Devastated w/the texts I’m getting asking if this is ok. No. Never.”

Okmin then shared some advice for young reporters.

“There’s coaches who don’t give anything — even apologize early in [the week] for it,” she said. “You gather info in those conversations & take [with] you - ‘he was looking for this, hoped he didn’t see that.’ My point being YOU PREPARE for these instances.”

In a telephone conversation with PFT, Okmin explained that sideline reporters have grown accustomed to periodic challenges to their relevance and value. She said that, in this case, the disappointment was enhanced by the fact that it “came from within.” In her efforts to mentor young reporters, she’s concerned that this example will cause them to believe that this is an appropriate way to make it in the business.

Okmin said that she has not yet spoken to Thompson about the situation, but that she expects to at some point.

Fox referred PFT to Amazon for comment on the situation. After a specific question was asked about a Fox colleague criticizing Thompson publicly, Fox declined comment.

Amazon declined comment.

Earlier in the day, however, sports business reporter Daniel Kaplan posted that he asked Amazon if it would be addressing the situation on tonight’s pregame show for Bengals-Ravens on Amazon Prime. “She was telling a story from 15 years ago,” Amazon told Kaplan.

Kaplan later deleted the post, without comment.

It remains to be seen whether Thompson addresses the situation tonight on Amazon, or elsewhere.

Always felt those reports were useless anyway. Only time it is has value is of they show the video so we can see the demeanor and hear tone of coaches.

What!
Someone made false comments on TV?
That's it, I'm going back to "social media" for the truth!😄😄😄

Most of the time they pretty much say the same thing after halftime anyway. I never paid much attention to it.

buckeyepackfan;460709What!
Someone made false comments on TV?
That's it, I'm going back to "social media" for the truth!😄😄😄

It's not as simple as that. When a REPORTER is relaying to is fans what a coach said. There's an expectation of accuracy. The job Title is reporter, not entertainer. That's the distinction that's causing issues.

But as I said. The "reports" are frivolous unless we hear the coach themselves. And even then it's usually a waste.

Hmmm is she changing her story? 🤔 Or did people misinterpreted what she said?

“Ok, let’s address the elephant in the room. I have a responsibility to myself and my employers to clarify what is being reported. When on a podcast this week, I said I would make up reports early if my career when I worked as a sideline reporter before I transitioned to my current host role.

“Working in media I understand how important words are and I chose the wrong words to describe the situation. I’m sorry. I have never lied about anything or been unethical during my time as a sports broadcaster.

“In the absence of a coach providing any information that could further my report I would use information that I learned and saw during the first half to create my report. For example if a team was 0 for 7 on 3rd down, that would clearly be an area they need to improve on in the second half. In these instances I never attributed anything I said to a player or coach.

“I have nothing but respect for sideline reporters and for the tireless work they put in behind the scenes and on the field. I am only appreciative and humbled to work alongside some of the best in the business and call them some of my best friends.”

Here are her comments from Pardon My Take, via AwfulAnnouncing.com: “I’ve said this before. I haven’t been fired [for] saying it, but I’ll say it again. I would make up the report sometimes, because A, the coach wouldn’t come out at halftime, or it was too late and I didn’t want to screw up the report. So I was like, ‘I’m just gonna make this up.’ . . . Because first of all, no coach is gonna get mad if I say, ‘Hey, we need to stop hurting ourselves, we need to be better on third down, we need to stop turning the ball over and do a better job of getting off the field.’ They’re not gonna correct me on that. So I’m like, it’s fine, I’ll just make up the report.”

Multiple sideline reporters reacted strongly to the admission after it surfaced on Thursday.

Some will question whether “the wrong words” were chosen when the initial comments were prefaced with an acknowledgement that “I’ve said this before” and “I haven’t been fired for saying it.”

Regardless, that’s her statement. Fox Sports and Amazon have declined comment to multiple outlets, including PFT.

Yes, if you have never lied or bene unethical, why would you preface it with, "I haven't been fired for" this?

Feels like she told the truth the first time, and now is making stuff up again, as she hopes someone is not going to correct her again on this...

Zero2Cool;460716It's not as simple as that. When a REPORTER is relaying to is fans what a coach said. There's an expectation of accuracy. The job Title is reporter, not entertainer. That's the distinction that's causing issues.

But as I said. The "reports" are frivolous unless we hear the coach themselves. And even then it's usually a waste.

Exactly, being entertaining is not a problem (that actually might be an improvement), it's the potential lying part of it that might be a problem.

But Sports shows could probably improve, instead of bothering the coach, just invite a former retired player for that team to talk at halftime to the interview person.