NEW #11
Avatar
zombieslayer Registered
Joined: Aug 07, 2008
Posts: 9,919
Avatar
zombieslayer
Registered
Joined:Aug 07, 2008
Posts:9,919
I'm with Rock.
I'm just surprised Rock hasn't willed it so.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #12
Avatar
Pack93z Select Member
Joined: Mar 17, 2007
Posts: 13,278
Avatar
Pack93z
Select Member
Joined:Mar 17, 2007
Posts:13,278
LOL.. okay then.. get rid of the damn receiver numbers in the single digits and teens..

While your at it.. eliminate anyone but linebackers wearing the 50's.. lol.

Stocky backs = Davis.. ouch..

Looky here.. Starks is a spitting image of Davis. upright style and the whole jazz.

0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #13
Avatar
Rockmolder Honored Member
Joined: Sep 14, 2008
Posts: 7,611
Avatar
Rockmolder
Honored Member
Joined:Sep 14, 2008
Posts:7,611
"pack93z"LOL.. okay then.. get rid of the damn receiver numbers in the single digits and teens..

While your at it.. eliminate anyone but linebackers wearing the 50's.. lol.

Stocky backs = Davis.. ouch..

Looky here.. Starks is a spitting image of Davis. upright style and the whole jazz.


"Rockmolder"40s go great with stocky players and with players who played before the 70s.


Ernie Nevers - 19591961

Numbers are just a huge pet peeve for me.

QBs - Nr. 1 a horrible numbers. Moon being the exception. Also, I'd never go higher than 13. Sorry Starr.

RBs - 20s and 30s are fine. 40s are for FBs and stocky backs.

OTs - They need numbers in the 70s. Hate seeing Tauscher line up at RT with number 65.

D-linemen. No numbers in the 60s. 70s and 90s are fine.

ILB/MLB. 50s. Always.

3-4 OLBs. 90s preferably, 50s ok.

4-3 OLBs. 50s preferably, 90s ok.

CBs. 21-24 and 31-34, preferably. Anything in the 20s and 30s is better than numbers in the 40s, though.

Ss. 20s or 30s, preferably, but 41-44 is acceptable.

Of course, I could pinpoint my favorite numbers, put out some more pet peeves and all, but this should be enough to declare me crazy, already.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #14
Avatar
zombieslayer Registered
Joined: Aug 07, 2008
Posts: 9,919
Avatar
zombieslayer
Registered
Joined:Aug 07, 2008
Posts:9,919
Crazy? Nah.
Just OCD.

Pack93z - not at all.
That guy always ran outside.
I wasn't counting, but I only remember once when Starks ran outside and it was for a no gain.
He almost always runs up the middle.

Starks should be 34.
Hopefully MM will correct this mistake in the offseason.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #15
Avatar
Pack93z Select Member
Joined: Mar 17, 2007
Posts: 13,278
Avatar
Pack93z
Select Member
Joined:Mar 17, 2007
Posts:13,278
There Zombie.. I think he just declared the rules.. I expect the subliminal transmission to be received by Goodell shortly.. with an announcement shortly thereafter declaring all teams met this mandate by the end of the week. lol.

I don't have the same obsession over the numbers as some.. but will agree some things appear simply odd.. however Starks number is not one of them.. the unis yesterday.. no numbers looked "right". ;)
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #16
Avatar
zombieslayer Registered
Joined: Aug 07, 2008
Posts: 9,919
Avatar
zombieslayer
Registered
Joined:Aug 07, 2008
Posts:9,919
I think evad04 is the only person here who likes those hideous uniforms.
I think he should be tested for color-blindness.
Definitely showed he's a Kinsey 0 though.
That's fo shizzle.

FYI - Goodell is a creation of Rockmolder as well.
There is no spoon.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #17
Avatar
Pack93z Select Member
Joined: Mar 17, 2007
Posts: 13,278
Avatar
Pack93z
Select Member
Joined:Mar 17, 2007
Posts:13,278
"zombieslayer"
Pack93z - not at all.
That guy always ran outside.
I wasn't counting, but I only remember once when Starks ran outside and it was for a no gain.
He almost always runs up the middle..


Our line can barely run block up inside.. now you expect them to hold them for edge runs and god forbid pull and kick.. lol.

In running style.. upright.. close
Cuts.. decisive but not necessarily quick.. close
Power.. What I seen yesterday.. off to a good start.

Long and lengthy.. Davis 6'2 212lbs. 6'2 1/8" 218 pounds..

They are similar in a ton of ways.. including the number.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others