WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

The first half was awesome. The second half was a typical Packers-Bears game, unfortunately, but they got it done.

The Packers couldn't tackle Matt Forte, but Rodgers to Jennings is better than Matt Forte on his own.

"Rockmolder"There are some interesting 1-on-1 match-ups going on in this game that might just settle the final score.

Clifton versus Peppers is one of the most important ones. If Clifton has a good day, he obviously won't shut down Peppers, but he's capable of containing him. Something that'd be a huge plus for us, as he carries that 4-man rush.

Our WRs against their secondary is an intersting one, as well. Those safeties are beatable. Easily. The corners, not so much. They play a lot of cover 2 and I reckon that, when the CB lets him go, Jennings might just fly by those safeties one or two times.

And as good as the Bears CBs have played, they're not deep enough to consistently cover a 4 or 5 man wide set. Hope to see some of that today.

On defense it's going to be interesting to see how we contain that speed at the WR position. We usually have Shields on the guy with blazing speed, but they have two WRs who fall into that category. I think we'll see a lot of Shields on Hester. I vividly remember a shot of Knox absolutely blazing right by Woodson, so I reckon we might play a bit with deep safety help. You have to respect that speed.

Secondly, the pass rush. Walden looked great against the Eagles and Bears, but not so much against Atlanta. If there's ever a time he has to step up his play, it's today. We have to take advantage of some average tackle play by the Bears. Especially since Cutler likes to either hold on to the ball or throw an ill-advised pass.

There's no doubt in my mind that Matthews will handle Webb again. Let's hope that the officiating crew actually calls some holds this time.

Packers @ Bears 24 - 14

Wow.
Only 3 points off.
Maybe there is some truth to this entire world being a figment of Rockmolder's imagination.

Hey, stop making me punch myself Rock.
That hurts.

cutler...the vajayjay of the nfl.

"4PackGirl"cutler...the vajayjay of the nfl.

funny.
If my wife had not explained that to me a couple of days ago I would have been really confused.

"wpr"

"4PackGirl"cutler...the vajayjay of the nfl.

funny.
If my wife had not explained that to me a couple of days ago I would have been really confused.

:facepalm:

glad to know at least she's cool.
;)

"4PackGirl"

"wpr"

"4PackGirl"cutler...the vajayjay of the nfl.

funny.
If my wife had not explained that to me a couple of days ago I would have been really confused.

:facepalm:

glad to know at least she's cool.
;)

I watch movies.
Especially westerns that are not Brokeback.

oh and she IS cool.

Original post has link to the highlight video.

So I get a phone call from my son yesterday afternoon.
He asks me if I want to go to the game.
2 tickets for $750.

He then goes on to tell me he met a couple at the dog groomers earlier that morning.
The wife doesn't want to sit out in the cold.
They are selling their tickets for $450 apiece or both for $750.
I am listening to him talk while I figure out the logistics to all of this.
When he finishes up I tell him that it is possible to get the money together.
We have better things to spend it on (The VA canceled his student loans and sent him a bill for more than $3600 just last week.)

Dead silence from the other end.
REALLY?
I didn't think we could.
I didn't even get their name or number.
I said they were charging a whole lot less than a lot of others were charging.
I said that it didn't matter any more.
Since I am going to have to funnel money to him to get through the school year (and his sister too since she defaulted on her student loan.) it makes my dicision a lot easier.

BUT IF HE WOULD HAVE ONLY CHECKED FIRST BEFORE SAYING NO...

The game today, or Super Bowl?