NEW
#11
shanks2122
Registered
Joined: Aug 11, 2008
Posts: 125
shanks2122
Registered
Joined:Aug 11, 2008
Posts:125
7-3 packers
im gonna sprout some new gray hairs in this one
im gonna sprout some new gray hairs in this one
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#12
Packnic
Registered
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
Posts: 373
Packnic
Registered
Joined:Jun 19, 2007
Posts:373
Lots of field goals.
We have had a little trouble in the red zone, and our defense bends but doesnt break.
23-13
The Good Guys.
We have had a little trouble in the red zone, and our defense bends but doesnt break.
23-13
The Good Guys.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#13
warhawk
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 07, 2008
Posts: 1,721
warhawk
Senior Member
Joined:Aug 07, 2008
Posts:1,721
"Packnic"Lots of field goals.
We have had a little trouble in the red zone, and our defense bends but doesnt break.
23-13
The Good Guys.
I think this is a good call Pack.
For me, reading the comments here I think many have followed this team so closely that the problem areas become "glaring" while the reality of it is the opposition has their "problem areas" just as well. We just don't follow the other guys enough to get over-hyped about where they fall short.
Of course we are worried about our "O" line but then again this the same group that went out in game three when we were in the MOST game LIKE mode of any time during pre-season and actually played the BEST three quarters of football of all four games. The rest of the time it's been rotating chairs in there.
I think at one point Arod was something like 18 for 22 in that game. I'll take that.
Our "D" line has been a little soft on the run but then again how many plays have Pickett and Jolly been in there together? Not many.
We're going to be fine. Nice to hear Hawk was back at practice.
Or receivers are TOO GOOD for the Vikes DB's. Our eleven defensive starters playing for real are TOO GOOD for a team with one threat.
Green Bay 27
Vikes 13
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#14
warhawk
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 07, 2008
Posts: 1,721
warhawk
Senior Member
Joined:Aug 07, 2008
Posts:1,721
"warhawk""Packnic"Lots of field goals.
We have had a little trouble in the red zone, and our defense bends but doesnt break.
23-13
The Good Guys.
I think this is a good call Pack.
For me, reading the comments here I think many have followed this team so closely that the problem areas become "glaring" while the reality of it is the opposition has their "problem areas" just as well. We just don't follow the other guys enough to get over-hyped about where they fall short.
Of course we are worried about our "O" line but then again this the same group that went out in game three when we were in the MOST game LIKE mode of any time during pre-season and actually played the BEST three quarters of football of all four games. The rest of the time it's been rotating chairs in there.
I think at one point Arod was something like 18 for 22 in that game. I'll take that.
Our "D" line has been a little soft on the run but then again how many plays have Pickett and Jolly been in there together? Not many.
We're going to be fine. Nice to hear Hawk was back at practice.
Or receivers are TOO GOOD for the Vikes DB's. Our eleven defensive starters playing for real are TOO GOOD for a team with one threat.
Green Bay 27
Vikes 13
Let's not make it more than it is. Our twenty two as whole are better than theirs and and our other twenty three on the sidelines are WAY better than their backups.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#15
all_about_da_packers
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 07, 2008
Posts: 1,965
all_about_da_packers
Senior Member
Joined:Aug 07, 2008
Posts:1,965
Blah. Now I'm nervous. I think our WRs can cause headaches for the Vikes DBs all day long.
But I also think the Packers' running game + O-line play isn't as polished as it should be going into week 1. Add that to a D that I think is still struggling to get back to it's level of play last year... and yeah I don't have a good feeling about this one.
Vikes win 24 - 17.
But I also think the Packers' running game + O-line play isn't as polished as it should be going into week 1. Add that to a D that I think is still struggling to get back to it's level of play last year... and yeah I don't have a good feeling about this one.
Vikes win 24 - 17.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#16
Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952
Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
^^^ He's lucky I like him otherwise for that prediction, =, BAN! :P
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#17
zombieslayer
Registered
Joined: Aug 07, 2008
Posts: 9,919
zombieslayer
Registered
Joined:Aug 07, 2008
Posts:9,919
"Zero2Cool"^^^ He's lucky I like him otherwise for that prediction, =, BAN! :P
Ban him anyways.
He's Canadian.
The tops of their heads come off when they talk.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#18
pack_in_black
Registered
Joined: Aug 11, 2008
Posts: 126
pack_in_black
Registered
Joined:Aug 11, 2008
Posts:126
^^^^ And they have squares for hands!!
I'm still bewildered as to how that cat types....
Oh, yeah- I say it ends up 32-13 Green 'n Gold.
I'm still bewildered as to how that cat types....
Oh, yeah- I say it ends up 32-13 Green 'n Gold.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#19
vikesrule
Registered
Joined: Aug 04, 2007
Posts: 2,121
vikesrule
Registered
Joined:Aug 04, 2007
Posts:2,121
"all_about_da_packers"..Vikes win ....
<from the "I never thought that I would say this" chronicles>
aadp is correct.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#20
Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952
Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
"vikesrule""all_about_da_packers"..Vikes win ....
<from the "I never thought that I would say this" chronicles>
aadp is correct.
Dude, seriously, that wasn't AADP, that was the rats messing with his keyboard. They have him kidnapped in the bathroom.
1
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others