NEW #1
Avatar
Laser Gunns Senior Member
Joined: Sep 30, 2009
Posts: 1,971
Avatar
Laser Gunns
Senior Member
Joined:Sep 30, 2009
Posts:1,971
We've had at least 3 (that I know of) this week.

Are they evil little spam programs, or are there really people who look for forums to post this crap?
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #2
Avatar
Zero2Cool Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952
Avatar
Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
Every morning I delete several spam posts and several spam accounts. What they do is create one account, then create another to "hide" the last registered user. They think by doing that, they'll have one in the chamber after the first one gets banned. It's really annoying and now I have it so their links change to "SPAM".
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #3
Avatar
rabidgopher04 Member
Joined: Aug 07, 2008
Posts: 1,216
Avatar
rabidgopher04
Member
Joined:Aug 07, 2008
Posts:1,216
But I was REALLY INTERESTED in buying cabinets in Birmingham!
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #4
Avatar
Pack93z Select Member
Joined: Mar 17, 2007
Posts: 13,278
Avatar
Pack93z
Select Member
Joined:Mar 17, 2007
Posts:13,278
SPAM.. the annoying nature of the beast.. out filter here at work compiles the weekly statistics.. we average around 56% of inbound mail that is spam and blocked. Less than .005 % of those are false positives.

That is the reality of what is out on the net.. and about the only reason I would ever consider supporting a fee on email.. to cut down the spammer/blast mailings.. but that really would be just off setting one cost (spam filtering) with another cost in terms of a bill for email traffic at best.

There isn't a good way of controlling it without being intrusive to the members or the admin.. whether it be an entry question to post or join, an approval process for the first x posts, a restriction on the type of posts (no links) for the first x amount of posts. Etc.

No matter what method, there will be some net affect to either the members or the admin. My opinion anyway.. nature of a forum.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #5
Avatar
Zero2Cool Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952
Avatar
Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
the difficult part is these spam fools are actually humans. how do you stop a human on a site that wants contributions in form of posts?
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #6
Avatar
rabidgopher04 Member
Joined: Aug 07, 2008
Posts: 1,216
Avatar
rabidgopher04
Member
Joined:Aug 07, 2008
Posts:1,216
Zero2Cool;243128the difficult part is these spam fools are actually humans. how do you stop a human on a site that wants contributions in form of posts?


Hold new members postings in moderation until they reach a certain number of approved posts (like 5). After they have 5 approved posts they can post without it being held in moderation. Then the spam would never reach the site because you didn't approve it.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #7
Avatar
Pack93z Select Member
Joined: Mar 17, 2007
Posts: 13,278
Avatar
Pack93z
Select Member
Joined:Mar 17, 2007
Posts:13,278
rabidgopher04;243130Hold new members postings in moderation until they reach a certain number of approved posts (like 5). After they have 5 approved posts they can post without it being held in moderation. Then the spam would never reach the site because you didn't approve it.


And what about the new actual members that now will be put through a trial phase with held posts. Are the more or less likely to stick around until they pass the trial phase? Maybe that is a benefit though.. it will weed out the hit and run type posters.. lol.


And what about the mod that has to approve them ... is it any less labor intensive than deleting spam and the accounts?
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #8
Avatar
rabidgopher04 Member
Joined: Aug 07, 2008
Posts: 1,216
Avatar
rabidgopher04
Member
Joined:Aug 07, 2008
Posts:1,216
Pack93z;243132And what about the new actual members that now will be put through a trial phase with held posts. Are the more or less likely to stick around until they pass the trial phase? Maybe that is a benefit though.. it will weed out the hit and run type posters.. lol.


And what about the mod that has to approve them ... is it any less labor intensive than deleting spam and the accounts?


I don't run the site. That's for you all to determine. :)
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #9
Avatar
Zero2Cool Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952
Avatar
Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
Ugh! And to make matters worse, I go off on someone like a complete buffoon who was just being generous with a good link. I hate the spammers even more!
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #10
Avatar
wpr Preferred Member
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Posts: 20,215
Avatar
wpr
Preferred Member
Joined:Aug 08, 2008
Posts:20,215
thanks for your hard work kevin.
If you want to let some of us delete the spam just say so.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others