NEW
#21
NEW
#22
I can't help but wonder.......just how overpowering would this Packer team be if not for all the injuries this year?
I see another win.....hopefully AR will get back to HIS "normal" and pick them apart.
I'd like to see Janis and Abracadabra on the field, too!
I see another win.....hopefully AR will get back to HIS "normal" and pick them apart.
I'd like to see Janis and Abracadabra on the field, too!
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
Edited
#23
I sense some over-confidence in here. Hopefully it ain't that way with the Packers.
Several things scare me (just a little anyway):
Melvin Gordon's coming out party - we're probably gonna be setting up to stop the 2nd ranked (statistically, for what little that's worth) passing attack. I could see him breaking into the open a couple of times like he used to for the Badgers. Also, Gates wasn't with them for most of the time they rolled up all those passing yards; Now, with him, they are even better. We've had problems with much worse TEs. Also, their D may not be great, but with our O Line, take nothing for granted. As good as our pass rush has been, we don't and probably can't do it with just 3 or 4 rushing. Rivers may be immobile, but he isn't stupid. If he gets rid of the ball quick, look out!
Just the same, I think our Offense is like Buckeye said, wanting to get back on top.
I'll go with 52-27 Packers - a nice fun game.
Several things scare me (just a little anyway):
Melvin Gordon's coming out party - we're probably gonna be setting up to stop the 2nd ranked (statistically, for what little that's worth) passing attack. I could see him breaking into the open a couple of times like he used to for the Badgers. Also, Gates wasn't with them for most of the time they rolled up all those passing yards; Now, with him, they are even better. We've had problems with much worse TEs. Also, their D may not be great, but with our O Line, take nothing for granted. As good as our pass rush has been, we don't and probably can't do it with just 3 or 4 rushing. Rivers may be immobile, but he isn't stupid. If he gets rid of the ball quick, look out!
Just the same, I think our Offense is like Buckeye said, wanting to get back on top.
I'll go with 52-27 Packers - a nice fun game.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#24
texaspackerbacker;326814I sense some over-confidence in here. Hopefully it ain't that way with the Packers.
Several things scare me (just a little anyway):
Melvin Gordon's coming out party - we're probably gonna be setting up to stop the 2nd ranked (statistically, for what little that's worth) passing attack. I could see him breaking into the open a couple of times like he used to for the Badgers. Also, Gates wasn't with them for most of the time they rolled up all those passing yards; Now, with him, they are even better. We've had problems with much worse TEs. Also, their D may not be great, but with our O Line, take nothing for granted. As good as our pass rush has been, we don't and probably can't do it with just 3 or 4 rushing. Rivers may be immobile, but he isn't stupid. If he gets rid of the ball quick, look out!
Just the same, I think our Offense is like Buckeye said, wanting to get back on top.
I'll go with 52-27 Packers - a nice fun game.
52-27 would be a nice relaxing game and as you say a fun game.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#25
As the "Bolts" try to deal with Aaron Rodgers and the Packer's WR's, I see Eddie "The Tank" Lacy running for 120+ yds and 2 TD's .
In addition, I see Rodgers throwing for 3 TD's as Mason Crosby has a nice FG to go with 5 extra points.
The Chargers will compete with the Packers in the first half, but will not be able to keep up in the second half. Clinton-Dix will get a second half pick and both Matthews and Peppers will each have 2 big sacks that kill several Charger drives cold.
The Packers swagger into their bye week at 6 - 0 .
[cheers] [cheers] [cheers]
In addition, I see Rodgers throwing for 3 TD's as Mason Crosby has a nice FG to go with 5 extra points.
The Chargers will compete with the Packers in the first half, but will not be able to keep up in the second half. Clinton-Dix will get a second half pick and both Matthews and Peppers will each have 2 big sacks that kill several Charger drives cold.
The Packers swagger into their bye week at 6 - 0 .
[cheers] [cheers] [cheers]
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#26
31-17 Packers.
From all the reports I've read, the Chargers offensive line is banged up. For a team that is second overall in sacks through 5 games, our pass rushers should be licking their chops to get after Rivers. This is definitely going to be a good measuring stick though for our D. First time we're facing what I'd consider a Top 10 passing QB and easily the best TE we've faced to date in Gates. As much as a beast Graham had been in New Orleans, he had next to zero chemistry with Wilson when we played them in W2. If they can contain Gates to 5-6 catches for under 100 yards and maybe a score and can keep the pressure on Rivers like they did Foles, I really like our chances in this game.
Offensively, an average D for our offense to try and rebound against. Getting Adams back would help the passing game. Home game so there's no reason they shouldn't be able to move the football more consistently.
From all the reports I've read, the Chargers offensive line is banged up. For a team that is second overall in sacks through 5 games, our pass rushers should be licking their chops to get after Rivers. This is definitely going to be a good measuring stick though for our D. First time we're facing what I'd consider a Top 10 passing QB and easily the best TE we've faced to date in Gates. As much as a beast Graham had been in New Orleans, he had next to zero chemistry with Wilson when we played them in W2. If they can contain Gates to 5-6 catches for under 100 yards and maybe a score and can keep the pressure on Rivers like they did Foles, I really like our chances in this game.
Offensively, an average D for our offense to try and rebound against. Getting Adams back would help the passing game. Home game so there's no reason they shouldn't be able to move the football more consistently.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#27
NEW
#28
No Davante this week.
Just came across Twitter.
GAMEDAY!
Whos gonna step up and have a day?
Just came across Twitter.
GAMEDAY!
Whos gonna step up and have a day?
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#29
[img=http://506sports.com/2015/06-CBS-L.png]3:25pm
CBS[/img]
The game is again on CBS for most of the country.
6.5 hours to kickoff.
The offense is still banged up and shorthanded.
I see the defense saving the day again.
Packers cover the spread but take the under on points.
CBS[/img]
The game is again on CBS for most of the country.
6.5 hours to kickoff.
The offense is still banged up and shorthanded.
I see the defense saving the day again.
Packers cover the spread but take the under on points.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#30
greengold;326896The offense is still banged up and shorthanded.
I see the defense saving the day again.
I think I depends on which Chargers defense shows up... they held the undefeated Bengals to just 24 points. But they also gave up 24 points to the Mike Vick lead Steelers, and 27 points the week before to Josh McCown lead Browns.
AND
MintBaconDrivel;326694San Diego Chargers ( 2 - 3 )
Points Against = 26.8 (23rd)
So while the Packers might be shorthanded, the Chargers defense seems to be struggling a bit too. So I'm hoping/guessing Rodgers can overcome the short handed offense some because their defense is struggling.
Also some talk about the Packers getting more creative again, with using Cobb in the backfield and maybe getting Janis/Abby more involved, after they didn't last week because they were nervous to be too creative against the Rams strong defensive front.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others