Quarless is an underrated boundary receiver. We've lost that option in his absence. I have been saddened and shocked with Davante's inconsistency. It really set us back this year. Quarless will be a welcome return/addition to our offense. The real key however will be a consistent running game yet I trust Mike and the coaching staff to find ways around that if it doesn't work.

There isn't one team this year that hasn't shown a weakness or two. Every team has at least one, so our job will be to exploit that weakness and hope that ours don't put us too far behind where we cannot catch-up, which was the most glaring in the Denver game.

Why is everyone counting the Seahawks out? I see them as the 1st or 2nd best team in the NFC right now. This is not the same team we beat early in the year, Wilson has gotten his shit together and they are scoring points on anyone. In there last 6 games they are averaging 34 points a game. And of course I will hear the well look who they played
so lets look:

Cardinals = 32 points
6 ranked scoring defense
49ers
= 29 points
18th ranked
steelers
= 39 points
11th ranked
vikings
= 38 points
8th ranked
ravens
= 35 points
25th ranked
browns
=
30 points
31 ranked

Ok I am done with my dose of reality, you can go back and put on your glasses and think the Packers have a cake walk against these teams. We have the awesome 10th ranked offense
with the panthers 1st cards 2nd and seahawks 7th

nerdmann;339500We can beat any of these teams.

Unfortunately, we're more likely to beat ourselves.

What Nerd said.

Seattle is the luckiest team; they have 1 quality win [Minn].
Rusty Ben and 1st game w/o Bell is ONLY reason they snaked by Pitt.

Wilson didn't have a bad game against us last year, we game-planned him into it.
The corners [Shields, Tramon]
took out their 2 WR and Hayward got the 3rd WR; Hyde manned-up on TE, then single or zero safety did the rest.
The 4 man rush L-R of Neal, Jones, Peppers, CM3 pressured and contained Wilson.
Schneider knew the ONLY way to beat PAck was to get another threat that couldn't be covered man, the dope figured that to be Graham; now no Graham [too bad for us-Willson is better].
Only difference is that their OL is MUCH worse!

On O losing Jordy hurts; but they lost Maxwell. It is impossible that Seattle beats us.; only AR can bet us.

Carolina is exactly who they were last year. We didn't figure nothing out in second half against them; the game was over, they let up, they played more prevent , so we got close, means nothing.
We will swamp them if we pay again; unless AR gives them 1st half again

AZ is the only competition; But our DL can beat their OL better than their DL can beat ours, which means we win handily.
The warm weather in GB and not so hot in AZ is huge.
Working in the 20-30s and playing a game in the 70-80s would be a killer; but right now high of 59 w/ 6mph winds is projected; if that stays we win
on Sunday; well, assuming AR is playing QB and not a less than Tolzien shows up.
AZ could lose next week; giving us #2; but dont matter, AZ will be nothing when Stanton is QBing them in POs.


ALL projections based on GB having a pretty good player at QB.

nerdmann;339500We can beat any of these teams.

Unfortunately, we're more likely to shit ourselves.

Fixed it for you

Hey Bar
im not sure but can I have some of what you are drinking?
You down play the wins seattle has like against the Vikes than the same can be said for us.
And for the weather for the game sunday, it will be in a retractable roof stadium.

dhazer;339561Hey Bar
im not sure but can I have some of what you are drinking?
You down play the wins seattle has like against the Vikes than the same can be said for us.
And for the weather for the game sunday, it will be in a retractable roof stadium.

Ahhh, I downplayed the win v. Pitt; said Minn win was the one quality win they have.

Do you want to discus the issue, ya know football? Com'on,
ya got a an opinion defend it with rational cogent argument.

Barfarn;339606Ahhh, I downplayed the win v. Pitt; said Minn win was the one quality win they have.

Do you want to discus the issue, ya know football? Com'on,
ya got a an opinion defend it with rational cogent argument.

I would try to back ya up, but you have too many abbreviations and I'm just not capable of deciphering them every six or seven words, lol.

I will say though that after viewing who the teams played and when, I'm more confident in the Packers and also I feel the Panthers will be one and done. You heard me, one and DONE!!!

Zero2Cool;339608I would try to back ya up, but you have too many abbreviations and I'm just not capable of deciphering them every six or seven words, lol.

I will say though that after viewing who the teams played and when, I'm more confident in the Packers and also I feel the Panthers will be one and done. You heard me, one and DONE!!!

is that confidence still present?

Packers look to be one and done, not the Panthers

bboystyle;340511is that confidence still present?

Packers look to be one and done, not the Panthers

Yes, my confidence is still present.
Panthers lost today, so did the Seahawks.
No team is going to win when your offensive line is down to Don Barclay at LT, your Center is hobbling and your RT is a backup Center.
I don't see how that's a winning combination, lol.

My confidence is only there IF the Packers get their starting offensive line in tact for the playoffs. If not, then no, the confidence is not there.

Zero2Cool;340513Yes, my confidence is still present.
Panthers lost today, so did the Seahawks.
No team is going to win when your offensive line is down to Don Barclay at LT, your Center is hobbling and your RT is a backup Center.
I don't see how that's a winning combination, lol.

My confidence is only there IF the Packers get their starting offensive line in tact for the playoffs. If not, then no, the confidence is not there.

Problem is, they've been shitting themselves badly like this for longer than their Olinemen have been out.