NEW
#21

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
luigis;353221I like the idea but I don't see it happening.
It's impossible to keep 7 receivers now that Jeff Janis has a broked hand. The guy had trouble creating separation with two hands.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#22

luigis
Member
Joined: Sep 14, 2008
Posts: 959

luigis
Member
Joined:Sep 14, 2008
Posts:959
Zero2Cool;353222It's impossible to keep 7 receivers now that Jeff Janis has a broked hand. The guy had trouble creating separation with two hands.
Well you can always have fun with the Geronimo Allison dancing project.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#23

DarkaneRules
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 15, 2008
Posts: 7,242

DarkaneRules
Veteran Member
Joined:Aug 15, 2008
Posts:7,242
I don't like the idea of having 2 running backs on your active roster, but if we're sure we can get a guy on the PS, then I'd be cool with it I guess.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#24

steveishere
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 29, 2012
Posts: 3,426

steveishere
Veteran Member
Joined:Jul 29, 2012
Posts:3,426
DarkaneRules;353224I don't like the idea of having 2 running backs on your active roster, but if we're sure we can get a guy on the PS, then I'd be cool with it I guess.
It definitely feels odd but look at it this way.
Even with all the problems and injury with our RBs last year our 2 #3RBs managed a total of only 13 carries between them.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#25

Barfarn
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 24, 2015
Posts: 1,553

Barfarn
Senior Member
Joined:Mar 24, 2015
Posts:1,553
I'd expect if we keep 2 RBs on 53, the general strategy would be to keep 2 on Practice squad assuming there are 2 PS worthy.
No team, including GB, saw Crock or Burks as being worthy for their 53, because no team saw them as a late pick or priority UDFA [we signed them for 5K and 1K respectively].
To date I cant imagine Crock or Burks has put anything on tape that has changed their opinion of these 2 backs. We'll get both on practice squad, if they are cut.
No team, including GB, saw Crock or Burks as being worthy for their 53, because no team saw them as a late pick or priority UDFA [we signed them for 5K and 1K respectively].
To date I cant imagine Crock or Burks has put anything on tape that has changed their opinion of these 2 backs. We'll get both on practice squad, if they are cut.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#26

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
I believe the Packers have only 2 RB's and 7 WR's on the roster at this point ... hmm ...
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#27

mi_keys
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 09, 2008
Posts: 1,883

mi_keys
Senior Member
Joined:Aug 09, 2008
Posts:1,883
Zero2Cool;355801I believe the Packers have only 2 RB's and 7 WR's on the roster at this point ... hmm ...
You forgot Cobb switched to running back
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#28

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
mi_keys;355802You forgot Cobb switched to running back
My bad ... I did forget. How dare I forget!!
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#29

luigis
Member
Joined: Sep 14, 2008
Posts: 959

luigis
Member
Joined:Sep 14, 2008
Posts:959
Zero2Cool;355801I believe the Packers have only 2 RB's and 7 WR's on the roster at this point ... hmm ...
You were right.
It makes a lot of sense because we never use the 3rd RB if both Lacy and Starks are healthy.
Furthermore Starks is only playing a few snaps.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#30

nerdmann
Premier Member
Joined: Sep 15, 2008
Posts: 30,967

nerdmann
Premier Member
Joined:Sep 15, 2008
Posts:30,967
Kind of worried about Montgomery. Hasn't looked the same as pre injury.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others