NEW
Edited
#1

MintBaconDrivel
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 12, 2012
Posts: 1,895

MintBaconDrivel
Senior Member
Joined:Dec 12, 2012
Posts:1,895
Enter the GameDay Chat
to discuss the game via the instant chat feature.

Green Bay Packers ( 1 - 0 )

Minnesota Vikings ( 1 - 0 )
to discuss the game via the instant chat feature.

Green Bay Packers ( 1 - 0 )
- Total Offense = 27th
Passing Offense =
23rd
Rushing Offense = 16th
Total Defense = 18th
Passing Defense =
24th
Rushing Defense =
1st
Points For =
27.0 (11th)
Points Against = 23.0 (17th)

Minnesota Vikings ( 1 - 0 )
- Total Offense = 26th
Passing Offense = 17th
Rushing Offense =
26th
Total Defense = 11th
Passing Defense = 18th
Rushing Defense =
6th
Points For =
25.0 (12th)
Points Against = 16.0 (9th)
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#2

DarkaneRules
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 15, 2008
Posts: 7,242

DarkaneRules
Veteran Member
Joined:Aug 15, 2008
Posts:7,242
Based on what I've seen from both teams, I give the edge to the Vikings in this game right now. I hope I'm wrong. If we win, that will be a big confidence boost to our players.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#3

Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 15,263

Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined:Jul 28, 2008
Posts:15,263
Their defense scares me.
But this would be a HUGE win!
I'd LIVE to screw up their opening of their new mausoleum!
But this would be a HUGE win!
I'd LIVE to screw up their opening of their new mausoleum!
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#4

DoddPower
Veteran Member
Joined: Sep 24, 2007
Posts: 4,474

DoddPower
Veteran Member
Joined:Sep 24, 2007
Posts:4,474
The likely fact that the Vikings are probably a better team than the Packers when the Packers have Aaron Rodgers and the Vikings have, well, whatever it is they have is sad.
This game could go either way simply because of the inconsistency of the Vikings QB situation. But if they get solid QB play somehow, they are better than the Packers and should win. The Packers might be catching them at a good time, though.
This game could go either way simply because of the inconsistency of the Vikings QB situation. But if they get solid QB play somehow, they are better than the Packers and should win. The Packers might be catching them at a good time, though.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#5

hardrocker950
Member
Joined: Nov 10, 2009
Posts: 1,484

hardrocker950
Member
Joined:Nov 10, 2009
Posts:1,484
This is a tough call. Their defense looked strong against a suspect offense last weekend, but it is hard to say how they stack up against a decent offense. While their QB situation isn't ideal, they have enough of a supporting cast to put some points on the board.
Our defense had some ups and downs, but made enough plays to come home with a W. If they can slow AP and force them to throw, I like our chances. Offense needs to play better than in Jacksonville or this game could be a rough one.
I think we will just squeak out with a win.
27-24
Our defense had some ups and downs, but made enough plays to come home with a W. If they can slow AP and force them to throw, I like our chances. Offense needs to play better than in Jacksonville or this game could be a rough one.
I think we will just squeak out with a win.
27-24
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#6

Smokey
Veteran Member
Joined: Sep 16, 2014
Posts: 5,404

Smokey
Veteran Member
Joined:Sep 16, 2014
Posts:5,404
MintBaconDrivel;355717Enter the GameDay Chat
to discuss the game via the instant chat feature.
Green Bay Packers ( 1 - 0 )Total Offense = 27th
Passing Offense =
22nd
Rushing Offense = 15th
Total Defense = 17th
Passing Defense =
23rd
Rushing Defense =
1st
Points For =
27.0 (10th)
Points Against = 23.0 (16th)
Minnesota Vikings ( 1 - 0 )Total Offense = 26th
Passing Offense = 17th
Rushing Offense =
24th
Total Defense = 10th
Passing Defense = 17th
Rushing Defense =
5th
Points For =
25.0 (12th)
Points Against = 16.0 (8th)
Not disputing this information, but where does it originate from ? You don't say who compiled this information .
[cheers]
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#7

Grabacr
Member
Joined: Sep 28, 2008
Posts: 217

Grabacr
Member
Joined:Sep 28, 2008
Posts:217
I see this one being very close, waiting to see on who is starting at QB.
Jaguars are on the cusp of becoming a good team (another draft should complete things) so we should take good confidence in our Run D stopping AP and forcing them to throw
Jaguars are on the cusp of becoming a good team (another draft should complete things) so we should take good confidence in our Run D stopping AP and forcing them to throw
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#8

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 07, 2008
Posts: 5,296

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member
Joined:Aug 07, 2008
Posts:5,296
The Titans handed The Vikes 2 td's.
I don't see Aaron and company doing that.
Even the best defense will wear down if it is on the field long enough.
Don't care who starts at qb for The Vikes, nether guy scares me.
STOP ADRIAN PETERSON AND THEY ARE DONE.
Packers 26 Vikings 17.
BOOK IT!
I don't see Aaron and company doing that.
Even the best defense will wear down if it is on the field long enough.
Don't care who starts at qb for The Vikes, nether guy scares me.
STOP ADRIAN PETERSON AND THEY ARE DONE.
Packers 26 Vikings 17.
BOOK IT!
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
Edited
#9

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
The Packers opened against an AFC unfamiliar opponent and thus did not deploy Jared Cook as to not give their conference and division rival any tape on how they were using Cook.
Sunday Night, we will see the Cook packages.
Packers 31
Vikings 17
Be it Sam or Shaun, my advice to either is "Run bitch, RUN!"
Sunday Night, we will see the Cook packages.
Packers 31
Vikings 17
Be it Sam or Shaun, my advice to either is "Run bitch, RUN!"
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#10

luigis
Member
Joined: Sep 14, 2008
Posts: 959

luigis
Member
Joined:Sep 14, 2008
Posts:959
A.Rodgers vs S.Hill ? Ridiculous
A.Rodgers vs S.Bradford ? Ridiculous
Not a close game, not even close.
A.Rodgers vs S.Bradford ? Ridiculous
Not a close game, not even close.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others