NEW
#391
I think it was lowry again
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#392
NEW
#393
whoever has lined up on him has wiffed a couple times
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#394
NEW
#395
NEW
#396
they'd go for it on 4th down
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#397
Hyde is really bad.
Not ok for a # 5 or 6 hes not good no matter where he is on the depth chart
Not ok for a # 5 or 6 hes not good no matter where he is on the depth chart
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#398
I wouldn't go for it if im them
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#399
hyde is valuable because of his flexibility but he is a little soft
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others