NEW
#451

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Posts: 20,215

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined:Aug 08, 2008
Posts:20,215
Cheesey;422564That’s kind of how I saw it. Yes, he WAS pushed into the guy, but he was running full speed and I doubt he could have missed hitting the returner.
Very good. The play was at the other end of the stadium and even with Tundra Vision I was uncertain. I had the radio on after the game but didn't hear anyone even mention it.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
Edited
#452

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
Zero2Cool;422562During the replays it looked like Brown was coming regardless of being blocked or not.
And I believe the rule is even if you are blocked into the returner, it doesn't matter.
I blame that on Brown 100%. He was running full speed at him and there's no way he was going to miss him. Brown was following the ball.
I need to clarify this. I believe the rule is the returner signals fair catch, it does not matter if you were blocked into the returner or not.
I believe if there is no signal for fair catch, that is when the blocked into returner deal comes into play.
Not a rules expert as they seem to change a lot, but that is what I believe I've heard and understand.
Edit, rules if someone wants to read.
http://static.nfl.com/static/content/public/image/rulebook/pdfs/13_Rule10_CatchKick_FairCatch.pdf
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#453

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Posts: 20,215

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined:Aug 08, 2008
Posts:20,215
Just saying [biggrin]
[TWITTER]1175865022431584262?[/TWITTER]
[TWITTER]1175865022431584262?[/TWITTER]
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others