NEW
Edited
#21
wpr
Preferred Member
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Posts: 20,215
wpr
Preferred Member
Joined:Aug 08, 2008
Posts:20,215
nerdmann;435170Hopefully we won't be punting much.
I was referring to King.
No punting at all.
#ALLGASNOBRAKES!!!
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#22
yooperfan
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 07, 2008
Posts: 5,676
yooperfan
Veteran Member
Joined:Aug 07, 2008
Posts:5,676
Just move on from King and be done with him!
He doesn’t help the Packers spending week after week in the hot tub.
He doesn’t help the Packers spending week after week in the hot tub.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#23
Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 15,263
Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined:Jul 28, 2008
Posts:15,263
yooperfan;435172Just move on from King and be done with him!
He doesn’t help the Packers spending week after week in the hot tub.
I agree.
He’s not helping the team if he misses the majority of every season.
He might be good when he plays, but when it’s only a few games a season, that’s not dependable.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#24
beast
Select Member
Joined: Oct 05, 2008
Posts: 14,470
beast
Select Member
Joined:Oct 05, 2008
Posts:14,470
Packers are thin at CB WITH King... so don't send him packing. Maybe don't resign him, but they need to sign someone (or two) or draft a good CB (or two).
I have a strange feeling, if Lazard plays this offense does very well, if he doesn't, they struggle more.
I have a strange feeling, if Lazard plays this offense does very well, if he doesn't, they struggle more.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
Edited
#25
Smokey
Veteran Member
Joined: Sep 16, 2014
Posts: 5,404
Smokey
Veteran Member
Joined:Sep 16, 2014
Posts:5,404
Smokey;435140If GB's Punter J.K.Scott is out with a back injury, who will Punt for GB (week 11) ?
I posted this on this thread 3 days ago. Now I discover a "NEW"
thread to cover the same subject.
Does anyone here READ.
Packers - 31
Colts
-
21
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#26
Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 15,263
Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined:Jul 28, 2008
Posts:15,263
Smokey;435175I posted this on this thread 3 days ago. Now I discover a "NEW"
thread to cover the same subject.
Does anyone here READ.
Packers - 31
Colts
-
21
Wow Smokey......is it that big of a deal to get upset over?
Here.....Smokey made a thread on this THREE days ago!!!! Come on, guys!!! Give him credit!!!!!
😂🤪😂😁👍
There, at least one person here READS!😁
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
Edited
#27
NEW
#28
nerdmann
Premier Member
Joined: Sep 15, 2008
Posts: 30,967
nerdmann
Premier Member
Joined:Sep 15, 2008
Posts:30,967
NEW
#29
Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952
Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
Painful loss. So many mistakes and still could have won the game if Rodgers looked to Tonyan end of fourth quarter instead of Adams. Not faulting looking at Adams, but damn 85 was wide.
So many issues that are preventable with discipline and focus.
So many issues that are preventable with discipline and focus.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#30
go.pack.go.
Veteran Member
Joined: Nov 13, 2008
Posts: 4,074
go.pack.go.
Veteran Member
Joined:Nov 13, 2008
Posts:4,074
I don’t know whether to blame MVS for poor ball security or to blame LaFleur for not taking the field goal when he went for it on 4th. Frustrating as hell. I have no doubt that we would’ve won if MVS didn’t fumble it.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others