NEW
#21
beast
Select Member
Joined: Oct 05, 2008
Posts: 14,470
beast
Select Member
Joined:Oct 05, 2008
Posts:14,470
Bears DL Hicks is out, very helpful to the Packers OL. Their starting NT opted out of the season. So Packers should be able to run better.
I now say 31-24 with Bears getting a lot of garbage time yardage/points.
I now say 31-24 with Bears getting a lot of garbage time yardage/points.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#22
KRK
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 28, 2017
Posts: 4,313
KRK
Veteran Member
Joined:Jan 28, 2017
Posts:4,313
I just hope we keep 12 upright....if so, we win.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#23
wpr
Preferred Member
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Posts: 20,215
wpr
Preferred Member
Joined:Aug 08, 2008
Posts:20,215
Was not worried about this game.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#24
nerdmann
Premier Member
Joined: Sep 15, 2008
Posts: 30,967
nerdmann
Premier Member
Joined:Sep 15, 2008
Posts:30,967
Any word on Linsley and Lazard?
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#25
Mucky Tundra
Honored Member
Joined: Jan 11, 2013
Posts: 7,726
Mucky Tundra
Honored Member
Joined:Jan 11, 2013
Posts:7,726
nerdmann;435318Any word on Linsley and Lazard?
Lazard was cleared to return to the game, so I assume he's okay
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
Edited
#26
Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 15,263
Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined:Jul 28, 2008
Posts:15,263
“Da Bares” got points in garbage time.
But our guys sure took it too the “great” Chicago defense!
But our guys sure took it too the “great” Chicago defense!
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#27
NEW
Edited
#28
Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952
Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
The Bears having a bye week and the LB's they have -- that had me thinking this wouldn't be a good game for Packers fans to watch. Somehow, the Bears still disappoint
-- and I'm good with that!
I think the Packers have a pretty good WR1 and WR2 combination with Adams and Lazard. I was pleased with what I saw from Equanimeous St. Brown, too. He seems like a hands catcher (Rodgers prefers those types) and has some sizzle after the catch.
Speaking of WR's, look at 83 consoling the losing team ...
[attach]2172[/attach]
-- and I'm good with that!
I think the Packers have a pretty good WR1 and WR2 combination with Adams and Lazard. I was pleased with what I saw from Equanimeous St. Brown, too. He seems like a hands catcher (Rodgers prefers those types) and has some sizzle after the catch.
Speaking of WR's, look at 83 consoling the losing team ...
[attach]2172[/attach]
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#29
Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 15,263
Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined:Jul 28, 2008
Posts:15,263
St. Brown surprised me too! A quite pleasant surprise!
Maybe he will finally start helping the team consistently.
Maybe he will finally start helping the team consistently.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#30
nerdmann
Premier Member
Joined: Sep 15, 2008
Posts: 30,967
nerdmann
Premier Member
Joined:Sep 15, 2008
Posts:30,967
Cheesey;435329St. Brown surprised me too! A quite pleasant surprise!
Maybe he will finally start helping the team consistently.
Nice to see them bringing 19 and 87 along slowly like that. Maybe they'll be ready for the playoffs.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others