NEW
Edited
#1

MintBaconDrivel
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 12, 2012
Posts: 1,895

MintBaconDrivel
Senior Member
Joined:Dec 12, 2012
Posts:1,895
Enter the GameDay Chat
to discuss the game via the instant chat feature.
Click HERE to watch the game!

Green Bay Packers ( 13 - 3 )

Tampa Bay Buccaneers ( 11 - 5 )
to discuss the game via the instant chat feature.
Click HERE to watch the game!

Green Bay Packers ( 13 - 3 )
- Total Offense = 5th
Rushing Offense = 8th
Passing Offense =
9th
Total Defense = 9th
Rushing Defense = 13th
Passing Defense =
7th
Points For =
31.8 (1st)
Points Against = 23.5 (13th)

Tampa Bay Buccaneers ( 11 - 5 )
- Total Offense = 7th
Rushing Offense = 28th
Passing Offense = 2nd
Total Defense = 6th
Rushing Defense = 1st
Passing Defense = 21st
Points For =
30.8 (3rd)
Points Against = 22.2 (8th)
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#2

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Posts: 20,215

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined:Aug 08, 2008
Posts:20,215
I can't decide who GB should face. There are pros and cons for both. Probably NOLA.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#3

Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 15,263

Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined:Jul 28, 2008
Posts:15,263
wpr;436584I can't decide who GB should face. There are pros and cons for both. Probably NOLA.
That’s how I feel.
Not sure which I want to face.
Probably NO, as Tampa kicked us around during the regular season.
But you can bet the NFL wants Tampa to win. The SB in their home stadium, Tom Brady and all.
Guess we will see.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#4

Mucky Tundra
Honored Member
Joined: Jan 11, 2013
Posts: 7,726

Mucky Tundra
Honored Member
Joined:Jan 11, 2013
Posts:7,726
wpr;436584I can't decide who GB should face. There are pros and cons for both. Probably NOLA.
Let them come. There is one team yet in the North that still draws breath.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
Edited
#5

earthquake
Member
Joined: Aug 11, 2008
Posts: 1,571

earthquake
Member
Joined:Aug 11, 2008
Posts:1,571
I haven't really put much effort into comparing these two teams, but I think New Orleans is the more favorable matchup, if for no other reason than the QBs each team has. They're both ancient but one plays in a dome and has an unremarkable record in big games, and the other is perhaps the best all-time in big games and has a history of winning in cold-weather.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#6

beast
Select Member
Joined: Oct 05, 2008
Posts: 14,470

beast
Select Member
Joined:Oct 05, 2008
Posts:14,470
wpr;436584I can't decide who GB should face. There are pros and cons for both. Probably NOLA.They SHOULD face the winner of the playoff game against each other ;)
But I assume you mean who to prefer... in theory Buccaneers have the weaker pass defense and run offense should help the Packers...
But when we faced the Bucs earlier this season we couldn't stop the run and their play action killed us, plus they got even more offensive weapons now... while on defense, their DL physical matched up with our OL, and Jones couldn't out move their two great speed LBers, plus their heavy blitzing getting home meant Rodgers needed the WRs to get open quick, and important to note, the Buccaneers game was both Adams first game back from injury, and we were missing Lazard due to injury.
So in theory Buccaneers might shut down Jones and Tonyan, but IF they can give Rodgers enough time, the WRs MIGHT run wild, and I've also thought Dillon who's faster than Jones (not nearly as quick, but straight line speed faster), might be able to run over one of the speed RBs and keep going... but still, Brady has all those freaking weapons, do we really want to get into a shootout that we won't be able to run the ball as well in? That's risky.
On the other hand, we could fast the Saints, which both teams best WRs missed early this year, and I think the Saints might of missed a starting DB and DE as well. Saints quick passing attack will give our pass rush troubles, plus our defense biggest struggle has been stopping the run and covering receiving RBs, few better at that than RB Kanata. But Packers matchup fairly well, TE Cook and RB Karma coverage over the middle could cause lots of headaches, but Packers running especially Aaron Jones and Tonyan could be more effective I'm this one, and having the big three WRs all healthy as well.
So I'm thinking the Packers better matchup would be the Saints... plus Brady is used to playing in bad weather... the Saints aren't. And make sure you have an extra guy watching Kamara.
Cheesey;436586That’s how I feel.
Not sure which I want to face.
Probably NO, as Tampa kicked us around during the regular season.
But you can bet the NFL wants Tampa to win. The SB in their home stadium, Tom Brady and all.
Guess we will see.
I'm not sure the NFL wants a team in their home city in the Super Bowl... especially not Tom Brady nor the Patriots... as I think they want to avoid the unfair comments... then again, sometimes they seem to think any publicity is good publicity, so I'm not sure how they'd feel about it.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#7

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Posts: 20,215

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined:Aug 08, 2008
Posts:20,215
beast;436605They SHOULD face the winner of the playoff game against each other ;)
But I assume you mean who to prefer... in theory Buccaneers have the weaker pass defense and run offense should help the Packers...
But when we faced the Bucs earlier this season we couldn't stop the run and their play action killed us, plus they got even more offensive weapons now... while on defense, their DL physical matched up with our OL, and Jones couldn't out move their two great speed LBers, plus their heavy blitzing getting home meant Rodgers needed the WRs to get open quick, and important to note, the Buccaneers game was both Adams first game back from injury, and we were missing Lazard due to injury.
So in theory Buccaneers might shut down Jones and Tonyan, but IF they can give Rodgers enough time, the WRs MIGHT run wild, and I've also thought Dillon who's faster than Jones (not nearly as quick, but straight line speed faster), might be able to run over one of the speed RBs and keep going... but still, Brady has all those freaking weapons, do we really want to get into a shootout that we won't be able to run the ball as well in? That's risky.
On the other hand, we could fast the Saints, which both teams best WRs missed early this year, and I think the Saints might of missed a starting DB and DE as well. Saints quick passing attack will give our pass rush troubles, plus our defense biggest struggle has been stopping the run and covering receiving RBs, few better at that than RB Kanata. But Packers matchup fairly well, TE Cook and RB Karma coverage over the middle could cause lots of headaches, but Packers running especially Aaron Jones and Tonyan could be more effective I'm this one, and having the big three WRs all healthy as well.
So I'm thinking the Packers better matchup would be the Saints... plus Brady is used to playing in bad weather... the Saints aren't. And make sure you have an extra guy watching Kamara.
I'm not sure the NFL wants a team in their home city in the Super Bowl... especially not Tom Brady nor the Patriots... as I think they want to avoid the unfair comments... then again, sometimes they seem to think any publicity is good publicity, so I'm not sure how they'd feel about it.
Well since you were critical of my grammar I thought I would reciprocate. Dillion is quick but I don't think he will be on the field when the NOLA RBs are out there. But you never know. I assume you meant "speed LBs". ;)
There are other grammatical errors but contrary to the opinion of some on this board, I am not a complete A-hole.
Viva La Victory.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#8

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
28° ESE 8 mph
Cloudy skies with a few snow showers later in the day. High 28F. Winds ESE at 5 to 10 mph. Chance of snow 40%.
Next Sunday weather doesn't look much different than today. Let's see how much it changes in the next few days.
Cloudy skies with a few snow showers later in the day. High 28F. Winds ESE at 5 to 10 mph. Chance of snow 40%.
Next Sunday weather doesn't look much different than today. Let's see how much it changes in the next few days.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#9

beast
Select Member
Joined: Oct 05, 2008
Posts: 14,470

beast
Select Member
Joined:Oct 05, 2008
Posts:14,470
Any updates on our injured guys...
Crosby, Lancaster, Dillon, Barnes (where there any others?)
Looks like Barnes and Lancaster might of come back in and played because their snap counts are pretty high.
Speaking of which Clark and Lowry playing over 85% of the snaps is impressive.
Crosby, Lancaster, Dillon, Barnes (where there any others?)
Looks like Barnes and Lancaster might of come back in and played because their snap counts are pretty high.
Speaking of which Clark and Lowry playing over 85% of the snaps is impressive.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#10

Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 15,263

Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined:Jul 28, 2008
Posts:15,263
wpr;436607
There are other grammatical errors but contrary to the opinion of some on this board, I am not a complete A-hole.
Viva La Victory.
WPR, Some are not happy unless they can find SOMETHING in a persons post that they can pick on.
It’s kind of like “look how smart I are! I kan find sumthin I kan show how much I no!”🤪😂
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others