NEW #31
Avatar
Cheesey Preferred Member
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 15,263
Avatar
Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined:Jul 28, 2008
Posts:15,263
Zero2Cool;454123Did he mention his off target throws and inaccuracy or just point out flaws by others?


He included himself.
And as was said already, how do we know whether or not the WRs were off on their routes?
That, and the MANY dropped passes by our WRs.
If it hits the guy in the hands, it should be caught. Yet more times than I could count, drives were stopped just because of that fact.
Adams caught almost everything thrown his way.
We can't count on our current crop of WRs to catch anything more then a cold .
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #32
Avatar
dfosterf Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 20, 2008
Posts: 6,885
Avatar
dfosterf
Veteran Member
Joined:Aug 20, 2008
Posts:6,885
The expediter in here is very attractive.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #33
Avatar
Cheesey Preferred Member
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 15,263
Avatar
Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined:Jul 28, 2008
Posts:15,263
I see where some think we are "close". Close doesn't count as a win. It's still a loss.
Earlier in this thread it was stated that all we had to do was split the rest of our games to get to 11wins.
Now if we split the rest of our games, it gets us to 8 wins. I doubt that would get us in the playoffs.
I'm usually positive when it comes to the Packers.
But I haven't seen anything to be positive about.
It's the same bad play game after game, no adjustments, no changes.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #34
Avatar
go.pack.go. Veteran Member
Joined: Nov 13, 2008
Posts: 4,074
Avatar
go.pack.go.
Veteran Member
Joined:Nov 13, 2008
Posts:4,074
Cheesey;454127I see where some think we are "close". Close doesn't count as a win. It's still a loss.
Earlier in this thread it was stated that all we had to do was split the rest of our games to get to 11wins.
Now if we split the rest of our games, it gets us to 8 wins. I doubt that would get us in the playoffs.
I'm usually positive when it comes to the Packers.
But I haven't seen anything to be positive about.
It's the same bad play game after game, no adjustments, no changes.


At least Barry seems to be getting the message. I think he called a better game. But the offense? Wow that’s ugly, and it has been all year long.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #35
Avatar
dhazer Veteran Member
Joined: Sep 14, 2008
Posts: 5,858
Avatar
dhazer
Veteran Member
Joined:Sep 14, 2008
Posts:5,858
I would love to know how many plays Rodgers changes out of during the game. Could his changing all the plays confuse the wideouts?
Just like it seemed like Watkins thought he should fake the block and run the go that he was wide open on lol. But on a side note one good thing did come out of it I picked up a point on everyone in the Pick em game lol. Lighten up folks we are still alive and football is entertainment.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW Edited #36
Avatar
Cheesey Preferred Member
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 15,263
Avatar
Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined:Jul 28, 2008
Posts:15,263
Thats true Hazer. It's just entertainment. (At least it was entertaining for Washington fans).
I guess because I'm old, the losses don't bother me as much as they used to. Although I'm a lot happier after a win.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #37
Avatar
go.pack.go. Veteran Member
Joined: Nov 13, 2008
Posts: 4,074
Avatar
go.pack.go.
Veteran Member
Joined:Nov 13, 2008
Posts:4,074
dhazer;454129I would love to know how many plays Rodgers changes out of during the game. Could his changing all the plays confuse the wideouts?
Just like it seemed like Watkins thought he should fake the block and run the go that he was wide open on lol. But on a side note one good thing did come out of it I picked up a point on everyone in the Pick em game lol. Lighten up folks we are still alive and football is entertainment.


That could be the case about confusing the wideouts on changing the call at the line. But that’s on the wideouts. They get paid millions to know the playbook and the calls.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #38
Avatar
Zero2Cool Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952
Avatar
Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
Offense.
Special Teams.
Defense.

Those are my worries in order.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #39
Avatar
hardrocker950 Member
Joined: Nov 10, 2009
Posts: 1,484
Avatar
hardrocker950
Member
Joined:Nov 10, 2009
Posts:1,484
Zero2Cool;454132Offense.
Special Teams.
Defense.

Those are my worries in order.


It's frustrating to see the defense keep these games within reach, only to see the offense shit the bed repeatedly.

Early on, they were putting the ball in Aaron Jones' hands - and to no surprise they were able to move down the field. Then... they decided to start throwing all over the yard - and the offensive problems yet again showed up.

Seriously - I don't get it. Is Rodgers more worried about having big passing stats than winning games? Is Lafleur just letting the QB call all the plays? Nothing about this team makes sense
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW Edited #40
Avatar
Zero2Cool Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952
Avatar
Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
Pass Blocking Grades per @PFF

LT: Zach Tom: 82.2 (High Quality)
LG: Elgton Jenkins: 41.3 (Bad)
C: Josh Myers: 83.6 (High Quality)
RG: Jon Runyan: 83.3 (High Quality)
RT: Yosh Nijman: 69.3 (Avg/Above Avg)

[attach]3838[/attach]
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others