NEW
#51

Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 15,263

Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined:Jul 28, 2008
Posts:15,263
Well....as bad as it was....we STILL shut them out. I'll take a 26-0 ugly win against a 3-0 good loss.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#52

matteogb4
Registered
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Posts: 217

matteogb4
Registered
Joined:Aug 08, 2008
Posts:217
tj deserves a shot next week...
CM3 has to play all the snaps...
chad has to be kicked for all the penalties...it is not possibile
grant needs to run with more aggressivity as he did at the end
CM3 has to play all the snaps...
chad has to be kicked for all the penalties...it is not possibile
grant needs to run with more aggressivity as he did at the end
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#53

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Posts: 20,215

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined:Aug 08, 2008
Posts:20,215
"DGB454""longtimefan""DGB454"Detroit 24 Pack 21
Not happy about posting that but I don't think much is going to change for GB.
I hope I'm wrong but nothing I've heard during the bye week makes me believe it will. I would love to see everything start to come together on both sides of the ball this week and we get on a roll.
Well D way off at half time
Should be like 30-0 but damn what the hell is Clifton doing?
Should be 30 to 0 we haven't been able to get into the end zone since the first quarter and
is anyone here happy about the way GB is playing? Tons of penalties and 5 sacks against
4 new Lions defensive linemen. Now Clifton is hurt again. If this was against a mediocre team we would be losing.
Wow that was about as frustrating of a shut out win as I have ever seen.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#54

Rockmolder
Honored Member
Joined: Sep 14, 2008
Posts: 7,611

Rockmolder
Honored Member
Joined:Sep 14, 2008
Posts:7,611
"matteogb4"tj deserves a shot next week...
He did look quite impressive. Appeared to have all the fundamentals down. Pretty much the only O-lineman to have just that. He's really not as raw as I though he would be.
"matteogb4"CM3 has to play all the snaps...
I don't know if he has to play all the snaps, but he sure was on fire this week. He was everywhere on the field. Great in coverage, getting some pressure, containing the outside run.... Ironic enough, he's showing exactly what we wanted out of AJ Hawk.
"matteogb4"chad has to be kicked for all the penalties...it is not possibile
I like Chad. I hope it had something to do with being out of the rhytm. Especially the illegal formation calls where bogus. He was really not lining up a lot differently, if any, than he normally does. Next to that, take a look at the Vikings line like dakota said last time...
"matteogb4"grant needs to run with more aggressivity as he did at the end
Grant was pretty impressive in the later portion of the game. It nearly looks like he doesn't get tired, whereas the defense does. Maybe a result of not running too much in the early parts of the game?
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#55

RedSoxExcel
Registered
Joined: Sep 30, 2007
Posts: 712

RedSoxExcel
Registered
Joined:Sep 30, 2007
Posts:712
Honestly we did what we were suppose to do against a team without their starting QB and best palyer (Johnson) - win.
Obviously there are always areas for improvement but great win.
A shutout is a shutout.
Its hard to do in teh NFL, against any team, even if its the Lions.
Obviously there are always areas for improvement but great win.
A shutout is a shutout.
Its hard to do in teh NFL, against any team, even if its the Lions.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#56

Dulak
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 20, 2009
Posts: 3,110

Dulak
Veteran Member
Joined:Jan 20, 2009
Posts:3,110
I still cant figure out why we didnt use jackson for more then 2 runs???
Whats the deal.
Bishop had a penalty on him.
I think the guy is just too pumped too play; maybe if we was in for a few series then he would settle down and not get these rough calls on him.
Was hawk in at all? ... I see no tackles registered with him.
I've been likeing hawk a bit more then barnett so far.
But of course my fav 2 ILBers are chillar and bishop(well I just want to dude to play so we can make a real analysis) ... when we are up by 20 why dont we use him?
I was hoping we would let rodgers get to 400+ yards... too bad.
Got to love the flee flicker but again only when we were up 20+ thats when we do the non standard grant up the middle play.
GG thou Ill take a win here ...
Whats the deal.
Bishop had a penalty on him.
I think the guy is just too pumped too play; maybe if we was in for a few series then he would settle down and not get these rough calls on him.
Was hawk in at all? ... I see no tackles registered with him.
I've been likeing hawk a bit more then barnett so far.
But of course my fav 2 ILBers are chillar and bishop(well I just want to dude to play so we can make a real analysis) ... when we are up by 20 why dont we use him?
I was hoping we would let rodgers get to 400+ yards... too bad.
Got to love the flee flicker but again only when we were up 20+ thats when we do the non standard grant up the middle play.
GG thou Ill take a win here ...
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#57

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Posts: 20,215

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined:Aug 08, 2008
Posts:20,215
"Rockmolder""matteogb4"chad has to be kicked for all the penalties...it is not possibile
I like Chad. I hope it had something to do with being out of the rhytm. Especially the illegal formation calls where bogus. He was really not lining up a lot differently, if any, than he normally does. Next to that, take a look at the Vikings line like dakota said last time...
If I remember correctly, the line judge will say something to the OT if he feels he is lining up too far off the ball before he calls the penalty.
He doesn't even have to have his hand on the LOS.
His head has to be in the mid section of the guard to his right and he still can't do that.
Too bad Colledge doesn't glance to his left and tell him to get his fat butt up another foot.
Chad lines up so far off the line because he gets beat on the outside if he doesn't.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#58

matteogb4
Registered
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Posts: 217

matteogb4
Registered
Joined:Aug 08, 2008
Posts:217
why bj didn' play a lot???
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#59

Rockmolder
Honored Member
Joined: Sep 14, 2008
Posts: 7,611

Rockmolder
Honored Member
Joined:Sep 14, 2008
Posts:7,611
"wpr""Rockmolder""matteogb4"chad has to be kicked for all the penalties...it is not possibile
I like Chad. I hope it had something to do with being out of the rhytm. Especially the illegal formation calls where bogus. He was really not lining up a lot differently, if any, than he normally does. Next to that, take a look at the Vikings line like dakota said last time...
If I remember correctly, the line judge will say something to the OT if he feels he is lining up too far off the ball before he calls the penalty.
He doesn't even have to have his hand on the LOS.
His head has to be in the mid section of the guard to his right and he still can't do that.
Too bad Colledge doesn't glance to his left and tell him to get his fat butt up another foot.
Chad lines up so far off the line because he gets beat on the outside if he doesn't.
Just like the Minnesota tackles would if they don't do this. I think that it's more a matter of disguising it than not using it. I mean, it's working pretty well for Minnesota.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#60

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member
Joined: Sep 14, 2008
Posts: 18,544

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member
Joined:Sep 14, 2008
Posts:18,544
Well, my prediction was way off in terms of the absolute score, but it hardly feels like a blowout.
The game raised more questions than it answers.
And despite the victory, we're still 2-1/2 games back.
The game raised more questions than it answers.
And despite the victory, we're still 2-1/2 games back.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others