NEW
#11

Packers_Finland
Registered
Joined: Aug 11, 2008
Posts: 2,623

Packers_Finland
Registered
Joined:Aug 11, 2008
Posts:2,623
"Finley88Beast"You could be right but hey he picked them off at least.He has a nose for the ball.
Yeah he makes plays, and he's in the right place at the right time. But his nine picks don't mean he's Reed, Polamalu or anything.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#12

Yerko
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 16, 2008
Posts: 2,191

Yerko
Senior Member
Joined:Oct 16, 2008
Posts:2,191
Enjoyable game for the Green Bay fans imo. Sit back and enjoy your popcorn or in Trom's case a shitload of shots.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#13

RaiderPride
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 18, 2008
Posts: 2,393

RaiderPride
Senior Member
Joined:Jul 18, 2008
Posts:2,393
I would like to think the Jitters are gone from opening on the road in the hostile Eagles Nest.
The team will sleep in their own beds and be in front of the home town crowd at the best venue in the NFL.
If not sports in general.
(Although Wrigley, Fenway, and Notre Dame might have some argument)
This should not even be close.
Perfect fit to start a 2010 Home Winning streak that I think might go (8) eight in a row during the regular season.
I will be watching the coverage on special teams.
How they contain Spiller and Parrish.
Two good games in a row in that department would be a blessing and perhaps a sign that things have turned around.
Rodgers will roll.
44- 13 is my prediction
EDIT:
Actually I will not be watching..
I will be looking forward to reading about it on Monday.
I am heading into the interior of British Columbia tomorrow morning at 06:00 HRS on a fishing trip to a forresty camp lake.
Big Ass Rainbow Trout.
7+ Pounds are the norm if I can find the perfect fly.
The team will sleep in their own beds and be in front of the home town crowd at the best venue in the NFL.
If not sports in general.
(Although Wrigley, Fenway, and Notre Dame might have some argument)
This should not even be close.
Perfect fit to start a 2010 Home Winning streak that I think might go (8) eight in a row during the regular season.
I will be watching the coverage on special teams.
How they contain Spiller and Parrish.
Two good games in a row in that department would be a blessing and perhaps a sign that things have turned around.
Rodgers will roll.
44- 13 is my prediction
EDIT:
Actually I will not be watching..
I will be looking forward to reading about it on Monday.
I am heading into the interior of British Columbia tomorrow morning at 06:00 HRS on a fishing trip to a forresty camp lake.
Big Ass Rainbow Trout.
7+ Pounds are the norm if I can find the perfect fly.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#14

Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 15,263

Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined:Jul 28, 2008
Posts:15,263
Once again RP, i am JEALOUS! I'd rather be there fishing with you!
I think we will do good against the Bills. As long as the team doesn't take them lightly.
I think we will do good against the Bills. As long as the team doesn't take them lightly.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#15

Mckennj3
Registered
Joined: Mar 13, 2009
Posts: 307

Mckennj3
Registered
Joined:Mar 13, 2009
Posts:307
I bet Byrd doesn't get another 8+ int season for his entire career. I agree with Finland, the guy had a mediocre coverage season but found himself in perfect tipped pass spots 6 times.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#16

Dulak
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 20, 2009
Posts: 3,110

Dulak
Veteran Member
Joined:Jan 20, 2009
Posts:3,110
ya this game will be fun at home - we should crush the bills with ease.
Vegas thinks so also - the spread is -13 atm for the pack (which is too bad) cuz I wanted to go with them but the spread seems a bit much.
38-10 is my take.
CM has 2 more sacks and woodson gets his 1st INT
and brohms sweating palms nets him the a total of 3 ints and a standing ovation from the packers crowd :) (dont think he will start thou too bad huh)
Vegas thinks so also - the spread is -13 atm for the pack (which is too bad) cuz I wanted to go with them but the spread seems a bit much.
38-10 is my take.
CM has 2 more sacks and woodson gets his 1st INT
and brohms sweating palms nets him the a total of 3 ints and a standing ovation from the packers crowd :) (dont think he will start thou too bad huh)
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#17

beast
Select Member
Joined: Oct 05, 2008
Posts: 14,470

beast
Select Member
Joined:Oct 05, 2008
Posts:14,470
With the Packers RB questions and with the Packers vet OT looking questionable at times against the Eagles should the Packers have Lang and Quinn Johnson active.
I think the Bills showed decent pressure on the QB but huge holes in coverage in their game against. If the Packers can I might try to run up the score early and take out some of the starters to get their back-up and running game some in game work.
Like give the back-up OTs Bulaga and Lang some time at the OTs, and run the ball to give Jackson, Nance and Kuhn more in game carries and maybe Flynn to see what he can do with a few passes... maybe let Shields more CB time with out S help over the top all the time so he gets more used to it if they have to do it in a game, more game time for Zombo.
What do other think about probably trying to end the game early with a huge lead to let the back-ups play.
I'm guessing someone is going to say the Packers should be trying that every single game... but my point was maybe trying to go for deep balls early for points instead of setting a tone with short passes and the running game.
I think the Bills showed decent pressure on the QB but huge holes in coverage in their game against. If the Packers can I might try to run up the score early and take out some of the starters to get their back-up and running game some in game work.
Like give the back-up OTs Bulaga and Lang some time at the OTs, and run the ball to give Jackson, Nance and Kuhn more in game carries and maybe Flynn to see what he can do with a few passes... maybe let Shields more CB time with out S help over the top all the time so he gets more used to it if they have to do it in a game, more game time for Zombo.
What do other think about probably trying to end the game early with a huge lead to let the back-ups play.
I'm guessing someone is going to say the Packers should be trying that every single game... but my point was maybe trying to go for deep balls early for points instead of setting a tone with short passes and the running game.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#18

Pack93z
Select Member
Joined: Mar 17, 2007
Posts: 13,278

Pack93z
Select Member
Joined:Mar 17, 2007
Posts:13,278
Hmmm... not in the preset [Official] match up thread? I seem a what the two of clubs coming. ;)
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#19

PackerTraxx
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 13, 2008
Posts: 2,158

PackerTraxx
Senior Member
Joined:Aug 13, 2008
Posts:2,158
am heading into the interior of British Columbia tomorrow morning at 06:00 HRS on a fishing trip to a forresty camp lake.
Big Ass Rainbow Trout. 7+ Pounds are the norm if I can find the perfect fly.
I have a case of extreme envy. Must have a report on the results.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#20

beast
Select Member
Joined: Oct 05, 2008
Posts: 14,470

beast
Select Member
Joined:Oct 05, 2008
Posts:14,470
"pack93z"Hmmm... not in the preset [Official] match up thread? I seem a what the two of clubs coming. ;)
I don't see an official match up thread so I just posted what I thought they should do...
Run it up early, get Rodgers and the vet out of there and the younger back-ups in to get more live game time and run the ball a lot to give the RBs more game day reps to get timing down and to run out the clock.
... also to get others opinions not to replace the holy official match up thread :P
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others