NEW #31
Avatar
zombieslayer Registered
Joined: Aug 07, 2008
Posts: 9,919
Avatar
zombieslayer
Registered
Joined:Aug 07, 2008
Posts:9,919
G-Force;198845Didn't watch or catch much of the highlights to the Lions/Panthers game...is Stafford's throwing hand still injured? If he is throwing anything like he did against the Bears, then I expect the Packers defense to have 1-3 interceptions..1 TD.

Pressure, pressure, and more pressure on Stafford. The kid hates getting hit and makes big time (dumb) mistakes when he has someone running after him. Pressure won't allow him time to watch Johnson run a streak down the field so he can float a crap pass to him and watch him catch it over 3 defenders.

Protect Rodgers. Suh is as dirty as they come and if given the chance, I am sure he will try to rag doll him...

Our offensive line hasn't been taking much this season. If something happens that shouldn't happen (Lang getting kicked in the junk) the offensive line reacts. I think this is going to be an extremely chippy game with a lot of bad intentions.

I don't think Rodgers accuracy will be an issue this week. I did see him hold his elbow after a play when he threw it behind Jennings on a slant. I am hoping there isn't some minor issue there and just the cold playing games with his head. Maybe his elbow was cold? :-k

Would be nice to see a resemblance of week 9 to week 10. Packers defense sharted themselves against the Chargers and came back in week 10 to smash the suck out of the Vikings. Maybe a close call against the Bucs in week 11 will bring out another fired up defense in week 12.

Packers- 35
Lions- 24

Gotta love all the "Johnny-come-lately" Lions fans...


G - Whoa! I was unaware of that nastiness.
No wonder people call Suh a dirty player.

I'm hoping [mm] keeps someone back to chip Suh.
Don't want to see [ar] taking nasty hits like that.
I would have ejected Suh for that crap.
That's not trying to tackle the QB.
That's trying to injure him.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #32
Avatar
Zero2Cool Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952
Avatar
Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
Weird, the forum software might not like quoting youtube videos.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #33
Avatar
wpr Preferred Member
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Posts: 20,215
Avatar
wpr
Preferred Member
Joined:Aug 08, 2008
Posts:20,215
Zero2Cool;198868Weird, the forum software might not like quoting youtube videos.


want me to delete it?
It is off topic anyway.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #34
Avatar
wpr Preferred Member
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Posts: 20,215
Avatar
wpr
Preferred Member
Joined:Aug 08, 2008
Posts:20,215
Zero2Cool;198831I'm going to need help with this from our resident choking expert, but I believe "chocking" should be spelled "choking". vikesrule, care to help out?


Yeah I knew it was wrong when I typed it.
forgot to go back and correct it.
fixxed now.
[grin1]
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #35
Avatar
Silentio Registered
Joined: Aug 23, 2009
Posts: 373
Avatar
Silentio
Registered
Joined:Aug 23, 2009
Posts:373
I wondering what the check down situation will be this week. For the last two weeks, in the first half of the game Rodgers has tended to hold the ball, take sacks, or take off and run with the ball even when there is a wide open check down available. Come the second half Rodgers begins to take the check down that’s available to him. Either Clements or MM are reminding him at the half that he can take a check down or it’s a game plan thing.

Anyway, with the way Rodgers was treated against the Lions in Detroit last season, I hope the check downs are available and I hope Rodgers takes them. It’d also be nice if Green Bay could get a run game going, but maybe we don’t even need it.

I have no idea what kind of score we’re going to see this week. Last season we beat them in Green Bay to the tune of 28-26, then at Detroit we took a loss at 3-7. I guess I expect it to look more like the former than the latter, especially considering Rodgers went out of the game in Detroit last season.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #36
Avatar
Yerko Senior Member
Joined: Oct 16, 2008
Posts: 2,191
Avatar
Yerko
Senior Member
Joined:Oct 16, 2008
Posts:2,191
Zombie, for some reason the NFL is trying to cover Suh's true image of being a dirty player. I have no idea why but that is a lot of dirt to sweep under the carpet. For some reason I feel like he THINKS he needs to make the big, nasty hits (or dummy tosses) to be considered a great player and that just isn't true.

I am sure [mm] will dial something up to keep [ar] protected though.

11-0 [rockon]
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #37
Avatar
Packers_Finland Registered
Joined: Aug 11, 2008
Posts: 2,623
Avatar
Packers_Finland
Registered
Joined:Aug 11, 2008
Posts:2,623
G-Force;198897Zombie, for some reason the NFL is trying to cover Suh's true image of being a dirty player. I have no idea why but that is a lot of dirt to sweep under the carpet. For some reason I feel like he THINKS he needs to make the big, nasty hits (or dummy tosses) to be considered a great player and that just isn't true.

I am sure [mm] will dial something up to keep [ar] protected though.

11-0 [rockon]


Suh is overrated as hell anyway. He takes so many plays off it's ridiculous. If you watch Lions games this season you'll notice. Sure, he'll get the occasional sack here and there, but he dissappears for huge chunks of the game at times.

Much more worried about Tulloch and Avril when it comes to their defenders. Avril has the speed to beat either of our tackles for an unblocked sack.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #38
Avatar
vikesrule Registered
Joined: Aug 04, 2007
Posts: 2,121
Avatar
vikesrule
Registered
Joined:Aug 04, 2007
Posts:2,121
I can sense the false bravado.

The smell of Packer fan fear is most palpable.
It permeates cyberspace.


Mr. Suh, meet Mr. Rodgers.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #39
Avatar
Wade Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 01, 2009
Posts: 6,429
Avatar
Wade
Veteran Member
Joined:Aug 01, 2009
Posts:6,429
Maybe the Packers can sign Burt Reynolds to a one-game contract to reprise a couple plays from The Longest Yard.

After all, he owes the Packers after mistakenly doing said things to #66.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #40
Avatar
Silentio Registered
Joined: Aug 23, 2009
Posts: 373
Avatar
Silentio
Registered
Joined:Aug 23, 2009
Posts:373
vikesrule;198919I can sense the false bravado.

The smell of Packer fan fear is most palpable.
It permeates cyberspace.

Mr. Suh, meet Mr. Rodgers.

This is so sad.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others