NEW
#21
DarkaneRules;224763I say hold Clay out one more game, but hey, I ain't no doctor.
I think if there is a hint of issue.. they will do just that. Especially with the way the collection of understudies, most notably Moses, played this past weekend.
That said, the Giants only give up sacks at a 3.2% clip.. the Packers currently at a 8.3% clip. So if they can apply pressure to Eli, it should help slow down the impact of Cruz in the vertical passing game. That will be vital IMO.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#22
NEW
#23
My thought is on the secondary here. While Hakeem Nicks has been underwhelming this season (1 touchdown), he is still a viable threat. So while we have Tramon Williams covering Cruz (or Nicks) we are again, depending on out rookies to make an impact covering another great wide receiver. I don't think the Packers have competed against a team with more than one major threat in the passing game. New Orleans is the only team that possibly comes close.
This will be a true test for our young secondary, more so than any other game. I think they can have a great game.
This will be a true test for our young secondary, more so than any other game. I think they can have a great game.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#24
15-1 last year, beat 'em in the regular season, the week off, maybe they (NY) were pissed about that reg season loss, etc. etc. etc. We saw the result. We had nothing to be pissed about.
After that game, we did. Things are different.
My Green Bay Packers are going to NY and are going to kick the fucking living shit out of the NY Giants, I don't care if we play our 3rd string due to injuries.
After that game, we did. Things are different.
My Green Bay Packers are going to NY and are going to kick the fucking living shit out of the NY Giants, I don't care if we play our 3rd string due to injuries.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#25
NEW
#26
dfosterf;22477615-1 last year, beat 'em in the regular season, the week off, maybe they (NY) were pissed about that reg season loss, etc. etc. etc. We saw the result. We had nothing to be pissed about.
After that game, we did. Things are different.
My Green Bay Packers are going to NY and are going to kick the fucking living shit out of the NY Giants, I don't care if we play our 3rd string due to injuries.
I think the emotions of the team were more at factor than an "angry" Giants team. T.J. Lang's father passed away, then days later Joe Philbins son ... that's a lot to take on.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#27
I think this is one of two losses for the regular season for the Packers. I see them losing this one close in the waning moments of the game.
Packers 24
Giants 27
If the Packers pull off some miracle and beat the dominating Giants, I think the only possible hiccup left is @Chicago.
Green Bay Packers leads New York Giants (31-24-2)
Packers 24
Giants 27
If the Packers pull off some miracle and beat the dominating Giants, I think the only possible hiccup left is @Chicago.
Green Bay Packers leads New York Giants (31-24-2)
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#28
This game scares me because they are coming off two bad losses and a bye week
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#29
Packers run the table versus the division, and they have nothing to worry about. 11-5 would probably be a comfortable way to get in as the wild card, but if those 4 additional wins come versus division foes, I'm confident we've got the division. Bears will probably end up 11-5 or 10-6 and if we beat them again we have the head to head, Vikings aren't a major contender unless they somehow manage to sweep us.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others