NEW #71
Avatar
play2win Senior Member
Joined: Mar 29, 2012
Posts: 2,812
Avatar play2win
Senior Member
Joined:Mar 29, 2012
Posts:2,812
Yeah, McCarthy does not have a good challenge record, and he knows it. But, you never know. I wanted him to challenge it, but could see why he did not. The play was that close. He didn't have anything to lose though, and I do believe he should have given it a go. Would have changed the game completely, had the play been overturned.

We played to not lose. Well said.

The officiating in this game sucked donkey dong.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #72
Avatar
Zero2Cool Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952
Avatar Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #73
Avatar
sschind Senior Member
Joined: Mar 05, 2013
Posts: 2,643
Avatar sschind
Senior Member
Joined:Mar 05, 2013
Posts:2,643
IronMan;261651The non challenge on the Quarless catch still bugs me. It wasn't a slam dunk, but definitely worth a shot.


Exactly what I said.
In a close game you have to challenge that.
It could be the difference maker or it could blow a close game wide open.
The worst that happens you lose a TO.
McCarthy doesn't seem to like to use them when it matters anyway.

Although I must admit when we downed the punt at the 1 I thought maybe it was a good idea after all.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #74
Avatar
sschind Senior Member
Joined: Mar 05, 2013
Posts: 2,643
Avatar sschind
Senior Member
Joined:Mar 05, 2013
Posts:2,643
Zero2Cool;261591


Great shot, even a second later when he just kind of turned and looked as if to say "where the hell is everybody"
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #75
Avatar
sschind Senior Member
Joined: Mar 05, 2013
Posts: 2,643
Avatar sschind
Senior Member
Joined:Mar 05, 2013
Posts:2,643
play2win;261700Yeah, McCarthy does not have a good challenge record, and he knows it. But, you never know. I wanted him to challenge it, but could see why he did not. The play was that close. He didn't have anything to lose though, and I do believe he should have given it a go. Would have changed the game completely, had the play been overturned.

We played to not lose. Well said.

The officiating in this game sucked donkey dong.


Yeah, I saw several holds that the Packers got away with.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #76
Avatar
Reignman Registered
Joined: Oct 24, 2013
Posts: 31
Avatar Reignman
Registered
Joined:Oct 24, 2013
Posts:31
Zero2Cool;261010Bears have 14 days to prepare for the Packers.
Packers have 7 days to prepare for the Bears.


I know I'm a little late, and there's plenty more important things to talk about, but I was bored and wanted to add my own meaningless info as I read through the topic ...

Since 2008 (beginning of McCarthy/Rodgers era) here's how the Packers have done when their opponent has 2 weeks to prepare. (now 4-6)

2009 at TB L 28-38
2010 vs MIA L 20-23 ot
2010 at NYJ W 9-0
2010 at ATL W 48-21 (playoffs)
2011 vs STL W 24-3
2011 vs MIN W 45-7
2012 at IND L 27-30
2012 at NYG L 10-38
2012 at SF L 31-45 (playoffs)
2013 vs CHI L 20-27

Here's how they have done when the Packers get 2 weeks to prepare. (5-2)

2008 at TEN L 16-19 ot
2009 vs DET W 26-0
2010 at MIN W 31-3
2011 at SD W 45-38
2011 vs NYG L 20-37 (playoffs)
2012 at DET W 24-20
2013 vs DET W 22-9

Do you know how Frazier has done after a bye?

2011 at GB L 7-45
2012 at CHI L 10-28
2013 vs CAR L 10-35

He's 0-3 and gets outscored 108-27 with 2 weeks to prepare lol.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW #77
Avatar
sschind Senior Member
Joined: Mar 05, 2013
Posts: 2,643
Avatar sschind
Senior Member
Joined:Mar 05, 2013
Posts:2,643
Zero2Cool;261591



Now that is one hole that I think I can honestly say even I could have run through.
Not likely that I would have gotten a TD (I can barely see that far much less run) but I think I could have gotten a first down at least.

0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others