NEW
#21

Mucky Tundra
Honored Member
Joined: Jan 11, 2013
Posts: 7,726

Mucky Tundra
Honored Member
Joined:Jan 11, 2013
Posts:7,726
buckeyepackfan;416688Grading a pick 5 minutes after it is taken is just ridiculous.
They didn't take a TE.
Get over it.
Gutey is building HIS team.
He knows what he has currently on the roster.
Still plenty of TE talent left
We'll find out if Gutey has one targeted in the next 2 days.
Psst I think you quoted the wrong guy Buck. [laugh] I'm actually really digging this guy
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#22

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 07, 2008
Posts: 5,296

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member
Joined:Aug 07, 2008
Posts:5,296
Mucky Tundra;417628Psst I think you quoted the wrong guy Buck. [laugh] I'm actually really digging this guy
Whoops.
Smokey knows I was responding to HIS instant grading.
One of the big problems on defense last year was the lack of turnovers.
With the 3 veteran FA pickups and these 2 guys, looks like Gutey is going all out to put a fast, hard hitting D on the field.
Results in 9 months.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#23

Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 15,263

Cheesey
Preferred Member
Joined:Jul 28, 2008
Posts:15,263
Yes WPR....I was just being...well...ME![lol]
I always see “bpa”, and many times it hasn’t been an area of need.
I’m happy that this time we seem to have got BOTH.
We sure can use some D help.
I always see “bpa”, and many times it hasn’t been an area of need.
I’m happy that this time we seem to have got BOTH.
We sure can use some D help.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#24

sschind
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 05, 2013
Posts: 2,643

sschind
Senior Member
Joined:Mar 05, 2013
Posts:2,643
buckeyepackfan;417630Whoops.
Smokey knows I was responding to HIS instant grading.
One of the big problems on defense last year was the lack of turnovers.
With the 3 veteran FA pickups and these 2 guys, looks like Gutey is going all out to put a fast, hard hitting D on the field.
Results in 9 months.
Just thinking about all the proms going on this weekend and how apropos that statement really is
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#25

sschind
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 05, 2013
Posts: 2,643

sschind
Senior Member
Joined:Mar 05, 2013
Posts:2,643
Cheesey;417633Yes WPR....I was just being...well...ME![lol]
I always see “bpa”, and many times it hasn’t been an area of need.
I’m happy that this time we seem to have got BOTH.
We sure can use some D help.
And yet some people are saying because of the Smith brothers signings it wasn't an area of need any more and was a case of drafting the BPA.
Opinions...Go figure.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#26

Mucky Tundra
Honored Member
Joined: Jan 11, 2013
Posts: 7,726

Mucky Tundra
Honored Member
Joined:Jan 11, 2013
Posts:7,726
NEW
#27

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
Mucky Tundra;417671
Ian Rapoport an "National Insider for NFL Network and http://NFL.com" according to his Twitter bio. Pretty much confirms that Savage would not have lasted until #30 if GB stood pat.
I'm speculating here, but I think Ravens would have taken him with pick 22.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#28

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member
Joined: Sep 14, 2008
Posts: 18,544

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member
Joined:Sep 14, 2008
Posts:18,544
Walter CherepinskyGreen Bay Packers: Darnell Savage, S, Maryland MAYOCK MALFUNCTION, FARMER FAIL, GRIGSON GAFFE, CERRATO SUCKAGE, BAALKE BLOOPER, CHIP TRAGEDY, KING CALAMITY, SASHI SUFFERIN SUCCOTASH Grade
I hope you like the new addition to the "F" grade. It's well deserved after what happened at No. 4 tonight.
This is an "F" grade all the way. Darnell Savage is a second-round prospect who may have snuck into the bottom end of the first round. There was absolutely no reason to move up nine spots for him. He, or someone very comparable to him, would've been available at No. 30 overall. I wouldn't have minded the Packers taking Savage had they remained at their own choice, but giving up resources for poor value is just a recipe for disaster.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
Edited
#29

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Posts: 20,215

wpr
Preferred Member
Joined:Aug 08, 2008
Posts:20,215
Once again Walter is taking both sides. On the big board he rates Savage @ 27. It's not surprising when a team bumps a prospect from 27 to 21. Even if it is a "reach" you don't go from an A-B to F because moving up. Trading a couple of 4ths for it still doesn't merit the F.
Walter has him rated as the #2 safety. Potentially a 1st round pick.
A GM taking him as the top selected safety is reasonable. Clearly not worthy of an F grade.
Walter has him rated as the #2 safety. Potentially a 1st round pick.
Darnell Savage, S, Maryland
Height: 5-11. Weight: 198. Arm: 30.63. Hand: 9.00.
40 Time: 4.36. Three Cone: 7.03.
Bench: 11. Vertical: 39.5. Broad: 10-6.
Projected Round (2019): 1-2.
4/20/19: Savage has become a hot prospect, putting together great workouts in the leadup to the draft. On top of the workouts, he has good tape from his final season at Maryland and teams love his character. Of all the prospects in the 2019 NFL Draft, Savage could be the leader for the most pre-draft visits as there are 10 teams and counting that have hosted him in April. Savage has to chance to go much higher than expected and could sneak into the first round. Sources say he is a smart kid, a team leader, and charismatic.
Savage played really well for the Terrapins in 2018, almost helping them pull off an upset over Ohio State. Maryland's defense did a nice job in the early going of holding the Buckeyes' play-makers in check, and Savage was a key part of that. In 2018, Savage totaled 52 tackles with four interceptions and two passes broken up. He does not have great size, but he makes up for it with speed and instincts. Savage also has the versatility to play some nickel cornerback.
A GM taking him as the top selected safety is reasonable. Clearly not worthy of an F grade.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#30

Mucky Tundra
Honored Member
Joined: Jan 11, 2013
Posts: 7,726

Mucky Tundra
Honored Member
Joined:Jan 11, 2013
Posts:7,726
wpr;418495Once again Walter is taking both sides. On the big board he rates Savage @ 27. It's not surprising when a team bumps a prospect from 27 to 21. Even if it is a "reach" you don't go from an A-B to F because moving up. Trading a couple of 4ths for it still doesn't merit the F.
Walter has him rated as the #2 safety. Potentially a 1st round pick.
A GM taking him as the top selected safety is reasonable. Clearly not worthy of an F grade.
Leaving comments on the site has been disabled, not allowing anyone to point this out. Heh
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others