NEW
#1

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952

Green Bay Packers ( 2 - 1 )
- Total Offense = 22nd
Passing Offense =
18th
Rushing Offense =
18th
Total Defense = 19th
Passing Defense =
13th
Rushing Defense =
23rd
Points For = 27
Points Against = 21.0

Minnesota Vikings
( 3 - 0 )
- Total Offense = 18th
Passing Offense =
26th
Rushing Offense =
7th
Total Defense = 4th
Passing Defense =
4th
Rushing Defense =
12th
Points For = 29.3
Points Against = 19.0
[align=center]
Click HERE for information on something special.[/align]
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#2

kobe16
Registered
Joined: Dec 16, 2008
Posts: 294

kobe16
Registered
Joined:Dec 16, 2008
Posts:294
i hope we can win this one. big momentum going into the bye week.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#3

Yerko
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 16, 2008
Posts: 2,191

Yerko
Senior Member
Joined:Oct 16, 2008
Posts:2,191
the Vikings pass defense would be 4th, look who they have played...
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#4

LambeauEast
Rookie
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Posts: 686

LambeauEast
Rookie
Joined:Oct 20, 2007
Posts:686
I despise the Queens to NO end, and I know they're beatable...I just don't think it's by us. PLEASE let me be wrong...PLEASE!
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#5

Dulak
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 20, 2009
Posts: 3,110

Dulak
Veteran Member
Joined:Jan 20, 2009
Posts:3,110
We almost have polar opposite teams
Viks - Good running game, upfront 7 D, and decent Oline
Pack - Good passing game, great secondary, and lousey Oline, but better TEs
Viks - Good running game, upfront 7 D, and decent Oline
Pack - Good passing game, great secondary, and lousey Oline, but better TEs
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#6

Rockmolder
Honored Member
Joined: Sep 14, 2008
Posts: 7,611

Rockmolder
Honored Member
Joined:Sep 14, 2008
Posts:7,611
"Dulak"We almost have polar opposite teams
Viks - Good running game, upfront 7 D, and decent Oline
Pack - Good passing game, great secondary, and lousey Oline, but better TEs
Look at the sacks.
Their offensive line is great at run blocking. Pass blocking, not that much.
They're putting all their eggs in one basket, though. Just look at the RT they just picked up. Loadholt isn't a pass blocker, he's a huge mauler.
I give them their run blocking O-line, but the pass blocking is just about the same. They might even be a bit worse, but with us being more of a passing team, we'll give up more sacks with the same O-line.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#7

cooolbeans08
Registered
Joined: Oct 05, 2008
Posts: 68

cooolbeans08
Registered
Joined:Oct 05, 2008
Posts:68
Ah, World War 4.
The Packers need to play like the did in the 4th quarter on Sunday, and not the first 3. If our offensive line is having problems, Jared Allen & company are going to take advantage of it. They need to hold up for the Packers to have a chance.
Peterson can run all over us. I thought we did a pretty good job against Jackson, but I just looked and he ran for 117 yards, so I guess we actually didn't. Still, last year Peterson ran for 192 and we lost by 1.
Our offensive line will decide the game, I think. If Rodgers has time like he did in the 4th Sunday, look out. But if he's scrambling around all day, it could be a rough day for GB, followed by a rough week of media love for Brett taking down his old team.
Of course, Rodgers could help by not holding onto the ball for so long. Sometimes it's smarter to take the sack, but he's had opportunities to get rid of it.
My prediction? 76-3, Packers.
The Packers need to play like the did in the 4th quarter on Sunday, and not the first 3. If our offensive line is having problems, Jared Allen & company are going to take advantage of it. They need to hold up for the Packers to have a chance.
Peterson can run all over us. I thought we did a pretty good job against Jackson, but I just looked and he ran for 117 yards, so I guess we actually didn't. Still, last year Peterson ran for 192 and we lost by 1.
Our offensive line will decide the game, I think. If Rodgers has time like he did in the 4th Sunday, look out. But if he's scrambling around all day, it could be a rough day for GB, followed by a rough week of media love for Brett taking down his old team.
Of course, Rodgers could help by not holding onto the ball for so long. Sometimes it's smarter to take the sack, but he's had opportunities to get rid of it.
My prediction? 76-3, Packers.
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#8

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
What was World War 3?
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#9

cooolbeans08
Registered
Joined: Oct 05, 2008
Posts: 68

cooolbeans08
Registered
Joined:Oct 05, 2008
Posts:68
"Zero2Cool"What was World War 3?
Think about who wears #4 on the Vikings. Skipping 3 is necessary for it to make sense. :icon_smile:
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others
NEW
#10

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Posts: 44,952

Zero2Cool
Elite Member
Joined:Oct 14, 2006
Posts:44,952
"cooolbeans08""Zero2Cool"What was World War 3?
Think about who wears #4 on the Vikings. Skipping 3 is necessary for it to make sense. :icon_smile:
Oh, using Vikings math eh?
0
SlickVision, Methodikal, Kevin and 5 others